guylacaptivite

joined 1 year ago

Agreed. As a game it was one of the best Ubi has done maybe ever imo.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It was. Most of it's criticism comes from the fact that it's not really an assassin's creed game anymore. It was mostly far cry: ancient greece

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Wait until you find out about Duesenberg. They made 400hp supercharged straight 8 monsters that cost more than a doctors annual salary back in the 20's and 30's. They were much faster than even race cars of the era. IMO the first relative "hypercars" if you compare what else was available.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And they're the best at all of that.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Losing Gale due to a failed dice roll is nothing like a dlc that's an absurd claim. You can't just reload a save to unlock a dlc. It was that simple for Gale.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Failing a roll is on you whether you like it or not. The ever looming threat of failure is important in story telling and suspension of disbelief. It's the opposite of dumb game design. So yeah you either reload until everything gets handed to you or you move on. You're talking like he's locked behind a dlc when you're just pissed a dice roll didn't go your way at level one.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Consequences of your decisions is what makes this game special. You're going to have a bad time going forward with this game if you cannot deal with the fomo.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Is it for the entire country? Because if so that seems very low.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wow. Couper des services au lieu de rendre la job viable. Du génie.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

...Just says there's a transponder that's supposed to judge if there was movement. It says nothing about how said transponder achieves that judgement. It doesn't simply senses movement as you astutely pointed out the car very obviously moved. That means it needs a reference point.

So Is it gps? Is it an accelerometer? Is there another sensor on the grid it has to cross? Is it telemetry? Why is there this much wiggle room?

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I would honestly be interested about where you got that the transponder is based on movement vs position. And I don't say that to catch you in a lie at all I am thoroughly honestly interested in this and would like to learn more about this tech.

edit: and yes from the in-board cam it does look like at least the contact patch was in-front you are right.

view more: next ›