flaviat

joined 3 weeks ago

Credulous coverage of AI slop on Wikipedia in c/techtakes@awful.systems

[–] flaviat@awful.systems 6 points 13 hours ago

So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality

Andrew Wakefield's 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed

permalink
fedilink
source
context