not if i can avoid it
enterprise dildomancy
figure 1: the loved one whacks a keyboard with a dildo, thus reproducing Tumblr
"coded by dildo" coined in this post and I have a whole tag here going back nearly 10 years
previously known as "coding by whacking the keyboard with dildos"
i've changed my mind, cursor is now the best ai coding tool
(just writing this up as today's Pivot)
wikipedia articles: hey this is pretty good!
wikipedia talk pages: what is wrong with you people
it's not actually any more painful than any wikipedia talk page, it's surprisingly okay for the genre really
remember: wikipedia rules exist to keep people like this from each others' throats, no other reason
I've just realised:
this reads just like a neoreactionary trying to be literary
e.g. the Dimes Square literary astroturf crowd
same problem as gen AI output: too much style, zero understanding of basic structure, you cannot get that fine detailed in structure and be that bad at the basics.
you realise i'm gonna ask for links to your example of this being misapplied here
it's gonna be a massive disaster across the wider economy, and - and this is key - absolutely everyone saw this coming a year ago if not two
Labour are all about the billionaire donors these days.
32
26
that time the pronatalist couple were too blatantly racist even for the EA forum
(forum.effectivealtruism.org)
I have a half written text about working definitions of intelligence in the AI field and whoops, it's all racism!