dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

IQ is a farce multiplier. Elon is a High IQ Individual which means he wreaks 1000x the havoc of a regular dumbass. IQ stands for Idiot Quickly

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago

BBC summary of the story of Ziz

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the user has been gently directed to the debate club

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the Laserjet 4M from the 1990s, the incredible unstoppable tank of lasers

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Superbabies is a backup plan; focus the energy of humanity’s collective genetic endowment into a single generation, and have THAT generation to solve problems like “figure out how to control digital superintelligence

The academic institutions in charge of exploring these ideas are deeply compromised by insane ideologies. And the big commercial entities are too timid to do anything truly novel; once they discovered they had a technology that could potentially make a few tens of billions treating single gene genetic disorders, no one wanted to take any risks; better to take the easy, guaranteed money and spend your life on a lucrative endeavor improving the lives of 0.5% of the population than go for a hail mary project that will result in journalists writing lots of articles calling you a eugenicist.

oh no, not a eugenicist!

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

apparently video is just huuuuge

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

this is also why pivot to AI is mostly 200-250 words, not 1200 or 2000 or 8000

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

per link, venture capital has been very reluctant to unambiguously realise the losses. a $1b book value is an (imaginary) asset you can hug and hold, a $114m loss is not.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

there were counterarguments that the authors anthropomorphised the LLMs inappropriately - which is a valid objection - and therefore these tests shouldn't have been run at all. The answer to that is that the companies are marketing this shit by anthropomorphising the hell out of it and literally claiming these spicy autocompletes are on the path to artificial super intelligence. So of course cognitive tests are gonna be appropriate.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

see also: Yudowsky has never consumed fiction targeted above middle school

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 25 points 1 month ago

https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@lritter/114001505488538547

master: welcome to my Smart Home

student: wow. how is the light controlled?

master: with this on-off switch

student: i don't see a motor to close the blinds

master: there is none

student: where is the server located?

master: it is not needed

student: excuse me but what is "Smart" about all of this?

master: everything.

in this moment, the student was enlightened

 

WE'RE BACK

 

Note: I don't care if the issues listed can be fixed - it's still like selling a nonworking car then getting the users to go to the shady cyberpunk district to get the fixes. It's like selling a dangerous power adapter and then go, hey, you can get an expert to go in there and do some soldering to the bridge rectifier and bulk cap trace widths, fix up the spark gaps so it complies with the most basic of safety regulations, and it will work as well as the competitor's, so aren't they practically the same? "Duurp, well at least you CAAAN get inside and solder-" Hey, what if a power supply just worked and was well featured? After like 40 years of development. Ever thought about that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›