crt0o

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Next step is baking your own!

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The cat carrier stays on during sex

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, I agree it seems scary, but all it really means is that morality is not universal but specific to humans. You could say everything is inherently morally permissible in the sense that there is no higher power which will punish you for your actions, so essentially there is nothing preventing you from committing them. In short, the universe doesn't give a shit what you do.

Still, your actions do have consequences, and you are inevitably forced to live with them (pretty much Sartre's viewpoint). Because of this, doing things you think are wrong is often bad for you, because it causes you emotional pain in the form of guilt and regret, and also usually carries along negative social repercussions which outweigh the value of the immoral act in the first place. You could say that people are naturally compelled to act in certain ways out of completely selfish reasons. In this sense, I prefer to look at morality more as a "deal" between the members of a society to act in a certain mutually beneficial way (which is fueled by our instincts, a product of evolution), than something universal and objective.

The reason I doubt in our current understanding of consciousness is because I find its distinction between what is conscious and what isn't quite arbitrary and problematic. At which point does an embryo become conscious, and how can something conscious be created from something unconscious? The simplest explanation I can imagine is that consciousness is present everywhere and cannot be created nor destroyed. This view (called panpsychism) is absolutely ancient, but seems to be gaining some recognition again, even among neuroscientists.

As you mentioned, "cogito, ergo sum" might be the only real objective truth that philosophy has uncovered so far. I am an optimist in that I believe surely more than one such truth must exist. If it was only discovered 400 years ago, surely there is more to be found. Maybe it is possible to collect some of these small fragments and build some larger philosophical theory from them, one that will be grounded in fact and built up using logic. I guess only time will tell.

And yes, of course some abstraction is beneficial in order to make sense of the world, even if it isn't completely correct or objective.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The issue I see with these theories is that this idea of inherent value they all arrive at is very abstract in a way. What does it even mean for something to have inherent value, and why is it wrong to destroy it?

Another problem is that we talk about destroying life without even fully understanding it in the first place. What if life (in the sense of consciousness) is indestructible?

The way I see it, people accept that life has some inherent value because our self preservation instinct tells us that we don't want to die and empathy allows us to extend that instinct to other living beings. Both are easily explained as products of evolution, not rational or objective, but simply evolutionarily favourable. All these theories are attempts to rationally explain this feeling, but they all inevitably fail, as they're (in my opinion) trying to prove something that simply isn't objectively true.

Anyways, I feel like even if you accepted any individual theory that seems to confirm our current understanding of morality and stuck with it fully, you would come to conclusions which are completely conflicting with it. For example in the case of utilitarianism, you could easily come to the conclusion that not donating most of your money to charity is immoral, as that would be the course of action which would result in the largest total amount of pleasure.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You can make ethical arguments based in reason.

Come on, I'd love to hear some, also the stakes are still up if you can give me a rational argument why killing is wrong.

 

Looks like a huge pig's head at first, but really it's just a photo of a man with a beard meditating, reflects the music perfectly imo.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

Why is killing people wrong, but ok in war? Why do we still kill animals even though we know it's wrong? Why is killing wrong in the first place? I bet you can't find a single rational reason. That is because ethics isn't based on reason, but instead on emotion. Given that, I don't find it very surprising that it's often very hypocritical.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Ah yes, good old hay ... delicious!

212
Radiolysisposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Why do you think renewables are better for the environment? Nuclear is very clean and produces next to no emissions. In comparison, solar panels have a production process which produces considerable emissions, once they fail (which is in around 25 - 30 yrs), they basically turn into toxic waste. Similar goes for wind turbines, but they also totally ruin the landscape, since roads have to be built in order to access and maintain them. Additionally they're not viable everywhere and look ugly af.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That's how it's done in chinese. Imo DD/MM/YYYY is better though, since in practice the year is most commonly just the current year and isn't nearly as important as the day or month.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would you even define hate speech

1
Today's tea (i.postimg.cc)
 

Had BTTC's Misty mountain oolong for the first time today.

Nose - dry leaves: floral

Nose - wet leaves: buttered vegetables, hot milk, floral

Liquor: smooth, floral, milky, slight vegetal and honey notes

The flavour was decently strong and there was absolutely no adstringency or bitterness. There were some stems in the tea, but that's to be expected considering it's machine picked. Otherwise the leaves were pristine and almost completely intact. Would make a fantastic daily drinker if you like gaoshancha.

2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by crt0o@lemm.ee to c/progmusic@lemm.ee
[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Altschmerz would mean something like old-pain if translated directly from German I think

81
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by crt0o@lemm.ee to c/albumartporn@lemmy.world
 

Had to include the back of the cover with this one too, since it's just epic

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From my experience, it's pretty goddamn hard to find high quality tea that ships from inside the EU. Almost all of the vendors carry a wide variety of teas, but they're all low quality, since they usually order from wholesalers and not directly from the farmers. If you're okay with that, you can try scouring the r/tea vendor list for something that fits your needs and is based in the EU. Your best bet if you want the real top-shelf stuff is to order from a specialized international store. I did just order some teas from https://beautifultaiwantea.com/ yesterday, can update about the quality and shipping once they arrive.

It would be pretty cool to have some kind of community vendor list here too. Maybe one that wasn't as static as the one on r/tea, people would be able to add new vendors, post reviews and such. Just an idea...

Edit: forgot to mention this, search for vendors that list as much information about the tea as possible, stuff like the month or at least season it was harvested, the village it originates from, the altitude, the cultivar, the harvesting method (hand/machine picked) etc. Also make sure the tea is as fresh as possible, ideally spring 2023 or winter 2022, since most teas will start to degrade after around 2 years if they're not stored properly.

 
 

Obscura totally blew my mind when I first heard it. It's definitely not for everyone, but it's unlike any other album I've heard.

 

An interesting album I discovered today, reminds me a lot of Canterbury scene.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by crt0o@lemm.ee to c/progmusic@lemm.ee
 

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing progressive music of all kinds. The wilder the better!

Please include the genre or FFO in the title of your post when sharing music and tag discussion threads with [Discussion].

Be kind and respectful to others - if you don't like something, that doesn't mean no one does. Criticism of music is allowed, as long as it's expressed in a polite way.

If you're on the fence whether your submission fits here, feel free to post - music is subjective anyways.

Enjoy your stay!

Edit: If you have any better suggestions for the community icon, feel free to share, this one was done more as a temporary solution.

view more: next ›