chloyster

joined 1 year ago
[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Pajama Sam: There's no need to hide when it's dark outside

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

This article doesn't interpret the Berlin interpretation correctly. The things the article says are "must haves" are actually just "high value factors" as the post says.

This list can be used to determine how roguelike a game is. Missing some points does not mean the game is not a roguelike. Likewise, possessing some points does not mean the game is a roguelike.

So while some of these are deemed important to roguelike, it can be a roguelike without all of those things.

Now personally I think the debate over the genre is silly, and I don't think the Berlin interpretation is really accurate anymore. But to be fair to it, it does not say a game has to have everything on that list. Spelunky is a roguelike. Idc what anyone says. Just because it isn't turn/grid based doesn't mean it isn't a roguelike. It has most all the other high value factors, and a handful of the low value factors as well.

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good mod tools

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 months ago

Because why would a random user not affiliated with the creation of the instance, therefore having no power over the spelling utilized in it, in anyway care

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago

I mean I don't love either company but I'd argue Google is a much more shit company than epic lol

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

As a Seattle fan, I couldn't disagree more :)

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Is this just an image? I see no news story here

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My guess is Lisa the skeptic. Where the family finds the bones of an angel that turns out to be a publicity stunt for the local mall

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If you're talking about the whole thing with dolphin almost being released on steam, it wasn't going to cost money. They weren't trying to monetize. They were just trying to have the download available on steam

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly do love the game but like, this year was stacked lol. I had a blast with it but other stuff was better

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I mean porting isn't an effortless task to be fair.

I'd like to be clear I definitely do not prefer subscriptions to just buying it once. But really there are 2 scenarios here. 1. The game doesn't exist on mobile at all. 2. It exists and you can play it if you have a Netflix subscription. I wish there was more than that but tbh I feel like I'd pick 2. At least with 2 the devs get more financial support and some more people have access to these excellent games

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

Well basically these games would likely have not been on mobile at all. Netflix is publishing them for mobile. If I had to guess, I'd say that Netflix approached these devs and offered to publish for them and provide them money for being on their service. For the devs, it's free money for something they likely weren't considering in the first place (porting to mobile). I definitely wish the devs would publish themselves (if they have the means) but it's not how it's happening unfortunately. And fwiw they are on the play store. You just need to sign in with a Netflix account when the game boots up.

view more: ‹ prev next ›