charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

James Clerk Maxwell. If it uses electricity then it's based on Maxwell's equations.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, you're right. I'm well versed enough in Star Trek to have already known that. For some reason I didn't actually think about the episode.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm not fully versed in The Troubles, but why must Irish unification be terrorism?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The 14th amendment doesn't require impeachment or criminal conviction, though. It's a completely different disqualification provision from impeachment.

For example, members of Congress cannot be impeached, but they can be disqualified under the 14th amendment. It makes no sense to roll impeachment and the 14th amendment into the same category of disqualification.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The only thing Congress can do is remove Trump's disqualification under the 14th amendment. They can't decide whether he's disqualified in the first place.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

"High crimes and misdemeanors" is a term of art that refers to acts committed by a public official which, while not necessarily a crime in themselves, are a violation of public trust.

For example, a president that accepted a foreign title of nobility without Congressional consent would have committed a high crime, but they couldn't be hauled into a criminal court for it.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

This will be challenged in court and almost certainly be struck down on 1st amendment grounds. Targeting a specific organization like that is a pretty flagrant violation, but I wouldn't expect the supporters of this bill to be familiar with the US Constitution.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 19 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Being convicted of a crime doesn't disqualify anyone; people have run for President from prison. And most of the people who attacked Congress on Jan. 6 would not be disqualified for it even if they are convicted of a crime for it.

Disqualification is not a criminal punishment. It's not a crime to be 34 years old, for example, or to have been born in another country. But those are still disqualifications, and they are and always have been enforced by the states.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 44 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Impeachment is expressly not a criminal procedure. It can't result in prison or fines, nor can it can't be pardoned by the President.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 47 points 8 months ago (19 children)

On the contrary, Congress is expressly forbidden from deciding whether someone is guilty of a crime.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 33 points 8 months ago

That is what is known as "sarcasm". I wasn't sincerely calling for violence against the Supreme Court, but rather drawing attention to their hypocrisy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›