charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 27 points 8 months ago (3 children)

According to the best current understanding of physics, atoms didn't come into existence until several hundred thousand years after the Big Bang. That would seem to rule out an atom-based creator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology)

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was suspicious that the article doesn't mention anything about what he's been charged with. So I looked him up. Seems he made a lot of money from running a major hacking forum that traded in stolen credentials, credit card fraud, and other online crime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RaidForums

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago

Rather, "whoever invented weekends was a genius."

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

OK, one more response.

"Obviously not" refers to your question about whether being a hypocrite is irrelevant. It's obviously not irrelevant. You know this; the question wasn't even sincere. You're just being antagonistic for antagonism's sake. Hence your faux concern about whether I'm having a bad day, etc. You're not even trying to have a discussion; you're looking for a fight.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Obviously not.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago (18 children)

It's kind of hard to take their criticism seriously when western sites and apps like the BBC or Instagram are blocked in China.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In New Vegas, completing Arcade Gannon's companion sidequest gives you a suit of Enclave advanced power armor, and a squad of Enclave troops with a vertibird will back you up at Hoover Dam. It's virtually impossible to trigger this quest by accident.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

The article makes it sound like you can push the gate open without a receipt, it will just set off an alarm.

view more: ‹ prev next ›