burliman

joined 1 year ago
[–] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I kept falling asleep. Finally made it through though... It’s like channel surfing a bunch of random sci-fi channels. No cohesion.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I was about to argue with you and toss out a bunch of ad hominems on you, but then I looked it up and by golly you’re right. I’m one of the 10,000 today it seems.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Everyone is a tester. Anyone who says otherwise is from Venus or Mars.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I am both shocked and pleased that Ford did not make this list. Seriously, the brand with the most sold pickup truck doesn’t make a list for just about everything?

[–] burliman@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] burliman@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago (10 children)

What would be the value of life then? I’ll save you the answer: no matter how big the number you say, someone else will say bigger. Until it becomes priceless, which is the answer.

However death and accidental death isn’t always avoidable. And when we pin the fault on someone we cannot expect to say “priceless” is what they owe the victim’s family. So we assign an amount of money or time that hurts, and call it good.

Doesn’t mean life is worth that. And saying so doesn’t help anyone.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Their wealth is almost entirely composed of equity, which topples if the world fails. All the cash they have to build these mansions is derived from this. The value of cash itself is derived from this. The only things of worth in a post-apocalyptic world are the tangible things they bought with cash while it was worth something. Shelter, food generation, defense… those are still worth something, along with more important things: physical skills and practical knowledge.

They will find themselves in their mansion-bunker, surrounded by people who they have paid to be there, in a world where the currency they use to pay them has failed. Do they not see what will happen? Even if their plan involves complete self-isolation, how do they plan on maintaining these massive properties and fixing things when they break? Perhaps they have a plan to close themselves off to some smaller, easier to maintain part of it. But then what is the whole point if all you have is solitary confinement? Even if it all works and they can survive it, they will eventually emerge into a world that has failed, where their wealth means little to nothing and the skills that built that wealth are as useful as ornamental testicles on a monster truck.

Why do they put their money toward projects like this, instead of towards ways to make the world more stable so that it doesn’t fail in the first place. If I had the immense wealth they have, which was completely contingent on the world and people that it stood upon, I would do everything I could to make sure the world would not fall apart. And if it wasn’t enough and it was failing still, I would spend even more until almost nothing was left. Building a fortress in a failing state is stupid, and history can tell you that with 5 minutes of reading.

In all their supposed intelligence, it seems they haven’t thought it through much… or I am missing something glaring.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

1990 Ford Thunderbird Super Coupe.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Office chairs and sushi.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

When cars first started being mass produced it wasn’t just Ford doing it. There were like 50 manufacturers, big and small.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Same people who did No Man’s Sky, in case anyone was wondering like me. Looks good!

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What about the questions of reliability when it comes to evidence after so long? Most abuse evidence comes from testimony (memories worsen with time), physical (requiring near immediate collection), or forensic (degraded or contaminated over time). If there is digital evidence that stands the test of time it can be very good. But even it can be degraded or partly lost or incomplete.

Cases from a long time ago typically stand on testimony and expert witnesses interpreting behaviors and interviews. It is almost always colored by victim empowerment and the desire for justice and making an example of someone. You might think it makes a good deterrent to prevent abuse. But there is a high risk of false accusations, which even when wrong and proven wrong, completely destroy lives.

We need to concentrate on empowering people to come out immediately. That it is not “okay” for abuse to occur at any age.

view more: next ›