_cyb3rfunk_

joined 1 year ago
[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

L'idée d'une constitution qui nous serait propre est bonne, mais ça serait bien que ça vienne d'un autre parti.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

On est juste responsable de nos propres actions.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not what I said. I just said the cost was significant, because you said "at no cost". I didn't say I would never pay it.

Also, twice now you've relied on wild hyperbolic statements to make your point. If I may offer some advice - I think avoiding those is better online, as they makes your comments seem like emotional knee-jerk, which undermines your credibility.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The cost is dishonesty, which to me is significant.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok et qu'est-ce qu'il pense du chandail bedaine pour les hommes trans?

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Bonne décision!

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because in their mind they are not lucky, they worked for it. And the others just didn't work hard enough.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I put that pressure on myself because I think that's something everyone should strive for, regardless of gender.

[–] _cyb3rfunk_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A more generic and neutral way to make this distinction is low needs vs high needs (low need being roughly same as high functioning).

Many people get upset when claims are made about intelligence. This alternate naming sidestep the problem.

view more: ‹ prev next ›