TheBigMike

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Time to move to the glorious nation of Kazakhstan, the top producer of potassium, to get some of those magic minerals to protect my countless buildings.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

It goes to 9 minutes from 8, since every single communication gadget will yell out that the sun has disappeared as reports come in from the other side of the earth.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I saw the video about Python from Life Of Boris and thought it looked fun, so I just decided to learn programming.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The part about voting is pretty simple logic.

In a voting system where the one who gets majority of the votes wins, the other votes don't really have an impact. Of course they are part of the race to win, but outside of that, what do the other votes do? Nothing. In other systems those votes would cause a second round to happen, but in the US system they don't. Those votes are just... gone.

Sure, you could argue that it's about "sending a message", but... why? Why do this now while the Project 2025 looms over the US if the Republicans win? The Democratic Party won't change before the elections and no amount of threatening to vote for 3rd party will change that.

The part about "if you don't vote for Biden, you vote for Trump" is not literal. It's more... abstract if that makes sense. Since if you vote for parties that have no realistic chance of winning, it means that a party that has a chance of winning doesn't get that vote and the party you least want in power is one vote closer to win the election. This logic goes for both Democrats and Republicans. If a Republican votes for third party that has no chance of winning, their vote metaphorically goes to the Democratic party, since the Republican party will be one vote further away from the Democratic party. Hell, this same logic, to some extent, also applies to other systems, but not as much as the US system.

So unless you are predicting Jill Stein to be making history and winning as a third party, a thing that hasn't happened, that vote won't affect the elections and the party you least want in power is just one vote closer to be winning.

In a two round system, your vote would matter more, since your vote would be affecting everyone's chance of getting an absolute majority of 50% all votes. And since everyone, but your chosen party, is one vote further from the 50% mark, a second round has a higher chance of happening.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 30 points 5 months ago (36 children)

Good meme! (I have no clue what any of it means other than the dates)

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

My first distrobution was the good old Ubuntu for a laptop that I used for school. I stuck with that for 2-3 years. During that time I really, really wanted to try out new distros, but I didn't want to lose my files and such, so I just stuck with it. During this time I also changed my desktop's os to Ubuntu, but I am not sure when I did it.

After I got a Laptop due to the previous being old and broken, I tried out Arch Linux and grew to love it more than Ubuntu, so I changed out my desktop's os to that as well when I got a new ssd and was migrating to it. I used Arch for another year or two, before my laptop had a disk failure and I had to reinstall. I installed Debian onto it, since I was feeling lazy and didn't want to go through the mess of installing Arch again. And then later I also installed Windows on it with dualboot for games that didn't want to work with Proton.

So basically I now use Arch on the desktop and Debian/Windows on laptop.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I was definitely more active on Reddit, since it had the niche subs I wanted to discuss on. Lemmy has more "generic" content, since it doesn't have the user base to grow those niche communities.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No clue about the constitution, since I am not american, but it would be logical to think that the religous can rule as long as they don't break other human rights.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean it kinda does with the whole "freedom of expression" thing it has.

I could be wrong on this, but that's how I interperted it.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because of those pesky human rights that mandate "freedom of religion" or whatever.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Could you elaborate, since I have absolutely no clue what connections significant enough you are making to say this.

[–] TheBigMike@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Let's hope we have better luck next time I guess.

view more: next ›