SignullGone

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
uap
[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

2024 looking to be an interesting year, especially if these alleged whistleblowers come forward.

 

Clear close-up footage. What do you all think?

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Longer interview here.

It's interesting that David Grusch admits that he does have first hand knowledge and will be revealing more in a few weeks.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Great to see more main stream coverage. The more people who see this and speak to their elected representatives, the better for disclosure.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

That's great news. I'd like to know his source. I'll give it a listen. You should post it in the community!

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Any forward progress is progress nonetheless. I agree with your frustration, however, I believe that regardless of this amendment, we have already reached the tipping point. Too much has come out and too many within the govt are aware.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio)

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Alabama)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky)

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana)

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Glad to hear other countries taking the "Disclosure Ball" and rolling with it. Thanks for sharing!

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It seems to me that things are picking up speed. I believe much of the disclosure timeline, if there is one, will hinge on the UAP Amendment remaining intact.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of the hypothetical points would point to them wanting to control the narrative, in my opinion.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If anything, they could be transparent and put some trust back in the government.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm assuming catastrophic leak would mean the US government doesn't get to control the narrative. I'm not sure how the leak would be catastrophic for the average citizen.

 

CONFIRMED- A classified briefing on UFO / UAPs scheduled for tomorrow from the intel community to lawmakers has been POSTPONED.

The briefing was meant to address some of David Grusch’s claims to congress under oath. No more votes for the rest of the week, so many lawmakers are flying back home tonight.


Edit:

Ask a Pol

NEW: Hearing the UAP Caucus is looking to reschedule their second Grusch SCIF briefing on Dec. 7th.

Fluid. More updates to come…

 

Congressman Tim Burchett (TN-02) sits down with Ryan Graves, the first active-duty pilot to come forward to Congress about UAPs. Graves founded Americans for Safe Aerospace and hosts the popular "Merged" podcast.

 

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the U.S. Government's UAP office, recently made the following comment about David Grusch’s claims regarding recovered ET tech:

"We are investigating each and every one of [Grusch’s claims & leads]. ... There are some bits of information that are turning out to be things and events that really happened."

Transcript here.

Additional Tweet by Christopher Mellon.

As I’ve said before, David Grusch is genuine and sincere. Moreover, I’ve heard the same claim from a number of other serious and well-placed officials. I’m confident that Congress will find more reasons to take these profound claims seriously as they continue their investigation.

 

Wow! GO GO UFO! 🛸 An amendment passed today to get David Grusch into a SCIF with those he testified to in Congress (under oath) at the public UFO hearing... to spill the beans of the details he couldn't reveal in the open hearing. We're talking UFO programs and names, UFO holding locations, list of "hostile" and "non-hostile" witnesses... and about the non-human "biologics" (bodies).

It's a meeting that's been blocked - but now it looks like it's gonna happen. it will undoubtedly lead to some subpoenas - which I think is good - for those who need that extra layer of protection to spill the beans and come clean about America's UFO exploitation and reverse engineering programs. I have some individuals in mind 😉 @RepEricBurlison

GO GO UFO!!!

view more: next ›