UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers

22 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

"We are investigating each and every one of [Grusch’s claims & leads]. ... There are some bits of information that are turning out to be things and events that really happened." - Dr. Kirkpatrick (twitter.com)

submitted 1 year ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the U.S. Government's UAP office, recently made the following comment about David Grusch’s claims regarding recovered ET tech:

"We are investigating each and every one of [Grusch’s claims & leads]. ... There are some bits of information that are turning out to be things and events that really happened."

Transcript here.

Additional Tweet by Christopher Mellon.

As I’ve said before, David Grusch is genuine and sincere. Moreover, I’ve heard the same claim from a number of other serious and well-placed officials. I’m confident that Congress will find more reasons to take these profound claims seriously as they continue their investigation.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It'll be interesting to see if Dr. Kirkpatrick pulls a Dr. Hynek and does a full 180 of his views on The Phenomenon as soon as he steps down.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Signull , did you read the Condorman sub stack? What did you think?

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe I have. Do you have a link?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. It’s quite long.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks! Sorry, I should've been more observant. I saw this posted, but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. Thanks for the reminder!

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious what the historical review he's wrapping up before leaving will look like. His work so far with AARO aligns with the history of Project Blue Book and, like Hynek, it's clear that Kirkpatrick is open to or even embraces the idea of NHI on a personal level. With the unknown members and agenda of AARO's governing group, AAROExec, there's really no telling how much of Kirkpatrick's actions have been influenced or are done on his own accord.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm thankful to see someone who can be objective about Kirkpatrick. I'm not sure what people expect but you don't get jobs like this if you are a loose cannon who spills the beans at your first press conference.

I want to know it all, too. My hope is the next person will open the cupboard door a little more. We all know this is a gradual process.

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not meant as snark, but where is the physical evidence? Even if it's a piece of metal with curious properties or something.

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Allegedly in the hands of government contractors, where it's in a grey area of both under and out of the hands of military and government. Then there's the layers of security clearance, where you have to essentially be in the group to have access to any details. The lack of transparency by these groups even within our own government is what fuels the speculation on what, if anything, may have been recovered over the years.