Quik

joined 1 year ago
[–] Quik@infosec.pub 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is great news! It’s absolutely crazy how bad IPv6 adoption still is; it’s basically still impossible to run any service IPv6-only, even if it’s only for like, modern, expensive devices where I think it would be fairly reasonable to expect good support for "newer" standards.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

iOS user here, uYou++ is quite good, but only a mod for the regular YT app, not a complete alternative.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago

What’s bad about (politely) asking for donations? After all, why not let people who really want to support the free software you’re creating do so even if they can’t code?

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 20 points 1 month ago

YouTube is/ its ads are are extremely privacy intrusive and there isn’t really an alternative to the platform. Next to the comparatively obvious network effects all social media platforms rely on is also because YouTube on its own is not that profitable and probably only really makes Google money via the data collected on the platform. This means only platforms that have a gigantic ad network themselves and are able to monetize said data as well as Google can can actually compete with YouTube— and as you see, there are basically none.

Also, the whole blocking ad blockers thing is trying to fundamentally reverse the power equilibrium between the website (the server) and the person visiting it (the client); because for the last 40 years or so, the server had the purpose of delivering content to the client which could decide what to do with and how to present said content. This sharing of responsibility between the two comes in many forms, starting with simple things such as screen readers or a reading mode for the browser.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is not necessarily the case.

You could only use this new system if the old one fails, ie. only for the say 10% of users that block ads, and so even if it were more expensive it would still be more profitable than letting them block all ads.

But I don’t think even that is the case, as they can essentially just "swap out" the video they’re streaming (as they don’t really stream "one video" per video anyway), bringing additional running costs to nearly zero.

The only thing definitely more expensive and resource intensive is the development of said custom software

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago

As a (fellow?) Munich I’m also looking forward to it…

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

It does (via the dock and probably directly as well), so that would absolutely work!

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

Then it looks like a really terrible concert and then you notice it’s cotton.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

I’m absolutely with you on the typing, the problem is (as far as I’m concerned) that learning typing takes a ton of time that I don’t want to spend just on that, so I’ll instead provide them with resources on how to improve typing skills if they want to.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

I planned on letting them build cheap, old desktops in groups so they are not as afraid of opening their devices (I find this to teach a different relationship to your devices in general) and so they don’t inherently see computers as a black box.

Thank you for your recommendations!

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 13 points 2 months ago

Especially the "don’t be afraid to break and how to troubleshoot" part seem very important to me, I will definitely do that. Thank you!

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I will generally do a lot of "how to use the web correctly", from basic privacy stuff (no, you don’t have to have something to hide; why care; no, it’s not too late…), ad blocking, using search engines correctly, evaluating sources etc.

view more: ‹ prev next ›