I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.
Portosian
"One nation, indivisible; except by itself and one."
I've still got an Oculus CV1 with touch controllers. It's never seemed like a good time to upgrade before. I'm feeling the hype for this.
Counterpoint: The little wheel and wire thing that shaves off bits of cheese is deeply satisfying to use
Eugenics is not inherently bad, it's just frequently used as an excuse to do really evil shit.
It's not just the psycho assholes looking for people to hammer. It's hard to want to engage with voice chat when the general public has no fucking concept of mic discipline. Nobody wants to hear the conversations happening around you. They don't want to hear you eating. They certainly don't want to hear your background music. Use push to talk.
A wealthy man from Soth Africa has weird views on eugenics? I'm shocked!
So I took a browse through your comment history out of idle curiosity. You're an "um actually" concern troll that just looks for things to argue about. It's pretty obvious you don't actually care. Maybe you shouldn't feel satisfaction with being a contrarian assbag for entertainment.
Are you sure that wasn't just an attempted joke about the phrase asexual reproduction?
Now it's a Z:\bra
I'm pretty sure cow is the species common name and bull/heffer are the sex variant terms.
You know, like how a rooster and a hen are both still chickens?
a= "birds are dinos"
b= "dinos are reptiles"
c= "birds are reptiles"
Structure: If a then b, therefore c
a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be "because birds are reptiles")
You've basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles