Thought I recognized that as the plot to a movie
MowFord
Lay off the bath water
Isn't Miracast an adhoc wifi network as opposed to simply connecting to an established WiFi network?
Fairly certain the statistic requires fsd to have been disabled for 10s before or is counted as human-caused
No, but it is your fault for not proofreading... Or just using copy paste of the actual home page
Nah I copied that permalink from a comment but it doesn't work
I don't even remember the post this comment is from, is there a way to search
If you read the article it is different. This relies on physically bringing connections to gain root access to the file system.
It's also unlikely Tesla can't just watch for modified files and update them everytime the car goes into drive or something. They probably won't do it, but to claim it's impossible is just disingenuous
One thing to note is you didn't notice a range difference based on speed because you're dealing with larger numbers in terms all around, but you definitely had the same efficiency loss in percent when going faster
Except that is really falsifiable. I pull data with TeslaFi and there's definitely no shenanigans being done.
The simplest explanation is that it's impossible to say (miles left) when you consume significantly more power going faster, going uphill, on a very hot day, etc. So they just go with the epa estimate based on your % state of charge and that's it.
If you want detailed info the car will quickly give it to you and consider all those factors if you put in a destination
You can get around it by disconnecting the Internet during setup