Martin

joined 1 year ago
[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Plus one for werewolves, a lot of fun and because of the debating element you get to see people getting creative, evasive, their ability to lie and what not

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jesus is not mentioned anywhere other than scriptures from hundreds of years after his supposed existence.

A bit off topic, but this is an exaggeration. There are several sources from the first century. That's decades at most, not centuries. The letters of Paul and the gospels, obviously, but also Jewish historian Josephus and some Roman governor from somewhere in what is now Turkey I think. There is actually not that much debate among historians that Jesus existed. Whether or not you want to believe he was saving the world is another thing of course.

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you haven't seen it yet, try Death and the Maiden (1994)

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary: Come again, you piece of shit?

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

No it was by trial and meant as punishment. Quite common even, but I first heard of it in relation to Cromwell c.s.

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The fact that they dug up Oliver Cromwell's body for a posthumous execution. It's just insane on so many levels

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I'm not concerned per se and I definitely applaud the MFA requirement. I mean I hate MS and don't like apps I don't need, and I don't trust them, but as others pointed out this would mostly just be whiny. That's why I asked for reasons why restricting users to MS Authenticator would be preferable. If it's more secure or technically way easier and thus cheaper to maintain then fine, I'll find an acceptable way to comply. If not, then it's them who are whiny and I'd rather make the case to let us use whatever authenticator we already have installed.

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

This could indeed be a valid reasoning. I'm going to investigate a bit. If you can easily cough up some MS documentation page on this topic please do

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks people, some good replies here. I could demand a work phone, but that's impractical, dragging around two phones etc. I'd like all my 2FA in Aegis and not have to think and pick the right app first, let alone pick and unlock the right phone. The Shelter option is very nice, didn't know about that. If my company won't budge I'm doing that. When push comes to shove I could even use outlook that way on my phone.

 

So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose "any authenticator" and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it's demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's also the naughty programmer getting spanked by EFL

 

https://xkcd.com/2807 I like how the Titanic ended up in the Caspian Sea