LittleLordLimerick

joined 1 year ago
[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You still use TP if you have a bidet though

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m a socialist but not a tankie. Criticizing tankies!= criticizing socialists

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The anecdote proves nothing because the model could potentially have known of the McGonagal character without ever being trained on the books, since that character appears in a lot of fan fiction. So their point is invalid and their anecdote proves nothing.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think yes, it’s inevitable. The reason why is that keeping up with constantly changing technologies requires constantly learning how to do everything over again, and again, and again. It will get tiring eventually, and people will feel that learning the ins and outs of yet another social media app just isn’t worth it when they can already get by.

I say this as as software developer who sees a new tool or framework or language come out every year that’s bigger and better than the last, and I see the writing on the wall for myself. I’ll be outdated and just some old geezer who works on legacy tech stacks in 10-20 years, just like the guys working in COBOL or whatever now.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m still calling it Twitter because it will piss off Elon Musk if everyone keeps calling it Twitter and I think that’s funny.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, they need to ramp it way faster. It's pretty garbage right now and there's really no excuse. Compare it to Lemmy and it's very obvious. Lemmy still has problems, but it's much easier to use and has way fewer bugs and glitches. If you're used to Reddit, then switching to Lemmy is pretty easy to do, and I can see average users making that jump. But Mastadon isn't even close to the user experience that Twitter/X offered, and I cannot see the average Twitter user sticking around and waiting for all the issue to be fixed.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying that they're right. I'm saying that calling them racists who think black people are dumb is a complete mischaracterization.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The problem with Rogan is that he doesn't have the knowledge or qualifications to push back against people spewing bullshit on his show, and so he ends up essentially making fringe, pseudo-scientific ideas seem equal to the mainstream expert consensus view.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It won't last unless Mastadon gets some serious improvements. It's buggy, glitchy, feature-poor, and confusing to use. There's no way in its current state it's going to compete with the big guys for the average person's attention.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Voters were able to select two candidates and only voted for one

Clarification: low-income voters from predominantly black areas did this, which is effectively disenfranchisement. That's the concern: that low-income minorities may be disenfranchised by more complex/confusing ballots. The concern is real because it already happened.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You guys are exhausting.

No one is saying black people are too dumb to understand ranked choice. They're saying that people from low income, predominantly black areas, under-voted when required to choose two candidates on past ballots. That means those people were effectively disenfranchised. If the evidence shows that ranked choice could potentially disenfranchise people from low-income minority areas, that is something to be concerned about.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Did anyone read the article? It’s not saying ever you guys think it’s saying. The DC Democrats are saying that in two predominantly black areas, having voters pick two choices on ballots has already led to confusion and that ranked choice will lead to even worse confusion.

They’re not speculating here, they’re describing what’s already known.

view more: next ›