JustVik

joined 4 weeks ago
[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, x86 legacy is really confusing. Especially if you are going to write your own kernel or bootloader.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe one of those videos is "So if you want to change the world, start off by making your bed."(youtube). It's not even a video, but the speech itself. This speech is quite inspirational. And it doesn't even matter who said it. And even usually I don't really like the military.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It constantly gives me 17.5 bits on several browsers firefox, nyxt, gnu icecat, librewolf...

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Maybe simple and easy to use GUI Firewall.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I like that most people become a little kinder at Christmas.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He is an ambiguous person. He certainly did a lot of good things, but there were mistakes and even from our point of view, quite cruel decisions. It is difficult to assess why he made certain decisions. There is a lot of unconfirmed information and ambiguous accusations around him, although, of course, there are bad decisions, maybe we don't know all the information, or maybe he was wrong. It was a difficult time back then. According to some reports, at the end of his life, even Lenin treated him ambiguously and was afraid of the concentration of power in one hand and even wrote a letter to the congress, but some doubt this, so it may not be true. To truly understand this, you need to be a historian and read a lot of original documents by yourself. But I don't think that we should consider him only a complete villain, as he is often exposed.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Linux. The Power of the Community.

I didn't come up with it and the picture is not mine. I just found it on the internet earlier.

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

You can fix it, really. :)

 

How can I add a simple requirement "do not train Al on the source code of the program" to AGPLv3 or GPLv3 and thereby create a new license?

Don't know is it a good place for such a question but I try :).

Why did I come up with such an stupid idea? There have been reported cases where artificial intelligence such as Github Copilot has been trained on many open source and free software projects, and in some cases it can output code snippets from GPL-licensed projects without specifying it. https://www.pixelstech.net/article/1682104779-GitHub-Copilot-may-generate-code-containing-GPL-code

I am not a lawyer, and I do not know where it is better to insert such a requirement. And how to formulate it in the best and correct form.

I understand it maybe complicated to check, to comply with this requirement and it may cause other difficulties, but I still think it can be a useful addition.

How to fit it with the fundamental freedoms of the GPL or it is unfitable?

I understand that this would make the license non-free, since it puts constraints on what the code can be used for. It's sad that it doesn't combine in some way. Maybe change requirements to do not train "closed source AI"(without code and training data of AI model publicly available).

And how can I name it? Is it better to name it without "GPL" If this new license cannot be considered free? NoAIFL or your variants :)?

Is it good to just add a new item?

For example like this:

Additional Clause:
You may not use the source code of this program, or any part thereof, to train any artificial intelligence model, machine learning model, or similar system without explicit written permission from the copyright holder.

or

Section [X]:
Restrictions on AI Training You may not use the source code of this program, or any part thereof, to train any artificial intelligence model, machine learning model, or similar system without explicit written permission from the copyright holder.

What you think about it? Maybe you already know licenses like this?

view more: next ›