HiddenLayer555

joined 9 months ago
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's gonna be real surprised when YHWH sends him to hell for violating the commandments (thou shall not kill and don't take the lord's name in vain).

 

Archive of the article at the time of posting:

‘We have all the cards’: Trump ending all trade talks with Canada ‘immediately’ over digital services tax

By Spencer Van Dyk

Updated: June 27, 2025 at 5:29PM EDT

Published: June 27, 2025 at 1:53PM EDT

U.S. President Donald Trump says his team is ending all trade talks with Canada, “effective immediately,” citing disagreement over Canada’s controversial digital services tax as the reason for shutting down negotiations.

He made the announcement in a post Friday on Truth Social, calling the levy “a direct and blatant attack” on the U.S. and its technology companies.

Trump’s announcement is a wrench in ongoing trade discussions between the two countries, which have been in the throes of a trade war for months, since the president’s first slate of tariffs on Canadian goods in February.

Trump has since levied a series of sweeping and stacked tariffs on Canadian products, targeting a range of industries. Canadian countermeasures are also in place.

Prime Minister Mark Carney, meanwhile, held a closed-to-media meeting with members of the Prime Minister’s Council on Canada-U.S. Relations earlier Friday.

On his way out of the meeting, the prime minister told reporters he had not spoken with the president since the latter posted to Truth Social.

“The Canadian government will continue to engage in these complex negotiations with the United States in the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,” reads a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office Friday afternoon.

Following the G7 meetings in Kananaskis, Alta. earlier this month, Trump and Carney said they would pursue negotiations toward a new trade and security deal by mid-July, a 30-day deadline from their discussions in the Rockies.

Trump, however, now says he’s ending the talks.

“We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period,” Trump wrote in his Truth Social post.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office Friday afternoon, Trump initially refused to answer a question about Canada, saying he was dealing with a “much more important subject,” signing a peace agreement between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

When he was asked again about trade negotiations, however, he said: “Canada has been a very difficult country to deal with over the years,” and calling the government “foolish” for implementing the tax.

“They put a tax on companies that were American companies that they shouldn’t. A very, very severe tax,” Trump said. “And, yeah, I guess they could remove it. They will. But I mean, it doesn’t matter to me.”

“We have all the cards. We have all the cards,” he added. “You know, we do a lot of business with Canada, but relatively little. They do most of their businesses with us. And when you have that circumstance, you treat people better.”

Digital services tax ‘discriminatory’: former U.S. trade rep

The tax — first pitched by the Liberals in their 2021 budget — sees the federal government impose a three per cent levy on revenues over $20 million from tech giants earning money off Canadian content and Canadian users.

It has been deeply unpopular and widely criticized by American lawmakers for years. They argue the policy disproportionately impacts U.S. companies, with former Biden administration U.S. trade representative Katherine Tai calling the levy “discriminatory.”

The first payment of the tax is due Monday and will charge retroactively to 2022.

In an interview on CTV’s Question Period in December, former Liberal finance minister Bill Morneau told host Vassy Kapelos that if the Canadian government wanted to make headway with the U.S. administration, it should look at scrapping some sticking-point policies, namely the digital services tax.

Feds standing by controversial tax

Asked about the levy by reporters on Parliament Hill last week, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the government was still planning to “go ahead” with the digital services tax.

In French, asked whether his government is willing to scrap the tax, Champagne said “we’re not there at all.” He added the tax was a topic of conversation at the G7 meeting earlier this month, and called it a “neutral” tax, which “isn’t directed toward any particular country.”

Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said in an interview with CTV News Friday that Canada will continue to “press in terms of Canadian interests.”

“I want to stress that our negotiations occur behind closed doors for a reason, that we need to continue to ensure that Canadian interests are protected at every turn, and we are disadvantaged if we continue to share strategy externally with the media,” Anand said. “But, I will say that the guiding principle of these negotiations is to ensure that these unjustified tariffs are removed, and that is our fundamental starting point.”

Anand also pointed to the U.K. and France having digital services taxes of their own, an argument often cited by the previous Liberal government under former prime minister Justin Trudeau when faced with criticisms of the policy.

Tax should be ‘expendable’ in negotiations: Manley

In a statement to CTV News, Business Council of Canada president and CEO Goldy Hyder said his organization has been calling for the federal government to scrap the tax for years.

“Bottom line is, (Internal Trade Minister) Chrystia Freeland, when she was finance minister, booked the revenues, and now they’re due,” Hyder said. “And these American companies have been asking that we align with the OECD and determine how to manage this.”

Hyder said he’s been in contact with Champagne about the business council’s position on the tax, and while he wouldn’t divulge the contents of those conversations, said “suffice to say, he has no intention of removing it.”

“And, if we were bluffing, the bluff just got called, and we’ve got to midnight Monday to get through this,” Hyder added.

Meanwhile, former Liberal finance minister John Manley said Canada should “keep calm and carry on” in the face of Trump’s reversal, telling CTV News “it’s not a trade negotiation unless somebody throws a tantrum.”

“We’re dealing with Donald Trump, after all,” he said.

Manley said the Carney government should be willing to concede the digital services tax if it gets the two countries closer to a deal, calling the levy “expendable,” but adding negotiators should hold out until there are concessions from the U.S. side before putting the levy on the table.

“If you’ve got something in a negotiation that you’re willing to give up, you don’t offer that off the top,” he said. “You hold back for the end.”

The parliamentary budget officer has estimated the tax will generate $7.2 billion in revenues for the federal government over five years.

With files from CTV News’ Judy Trinh and Luca Caruso-Moro

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Two Australians go to North Korea to get a hair cut while debunking Western propaganda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BO83Ig-E8E

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

The US itself is a risky and inefficient project.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ironic how US kids cartoons commonly portray "digging to China" as something americans can hypothetically do, to the point where a good portion of American adults just assume it to be true. Yet the only place where that's possible is South America.

Usually the people debunking the notion focus on the fact that the Earth is molten in the center so you can't dig all the way through it in the same way you can't dig to the ocean floor from the surface (which is reasonable don't get me wrong), but they rarely mention the fact that China is not actually on the opposite side of the Earth to the US.

This isn't a political comment. I just find it interesting that this is something literally anyone can disprove with a dollar store globe but no one bothers to do it and instead just assume the cartoons for children are factual.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

God I wish my network in Canada still supported Fairphones. My last Fairphone just stopped connecting to cellular service one day, which I probably should have expected given it's European bands only.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do they have DRM or something? I hope not. But if it doesn't, what's stopping anyone who bought the asset from uploading it somewhere else?

This is an issue with open source app/resource stores that to my knowledge no one has solved. If you stay true to the Free (as in freedom) software philosophy, then you can't really put anything in to enforce paid access to something, and even if you do, anyone with a text editor can just take that code out. But if you just let anyone who buys it redistribute it for free, you're not going to attract many sellers because they wouldn't trust their content to remain paid access only. Add to the fact that paid content is inheretly proprietary, or at the very least, the author certainly wouldn't choose to put Free as in freedom licenses on their content because that would literally legally allow anyone to redistribute it for free.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It's the correct amount of paranoia. The issue is society has normalized completely not giving a shit about your own privacy to the point where any attempt at preserving it is seen as abnormal.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Reading it back I can see how I might have come off as arguing with the OP. I had just intended to add some context in general around why "straight pride" isn't a generally accepted thing but gay pride is, because whenever this comes up you usually get at least one person asking "what, so we're supposed to be ashamed of being straight now? That's just discrimination in reverse!”

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

"Straight pride" isn't a thing. It's purely a reactionary response to gay pride.

The point of gay pride is for gay people to show that they're not afraid to be who they are in the face of systematic discrimination. It is specifically countering the culture of gay shame that had been the norm in the past. Straight people are already the overwhelming majority and have never been oppressed for their sexual orientation. There's was never any shame associated with it so it makes no sense to proclaim that you're "proud" to be straight.

It's like someone who finished a marathon expressing their pride for their accomplishment, and some loser who has to make everything about themselves says "well I sat on my ass all day and I deserve to be proud of that too!"

The issue is not that it's not okay to be proud of being straight, you're welcome to feel pride all you want. The issue is when you but into someone else's moment and make it about yourself.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is so poorly written I have no idea if it's sarcasm or not.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TLDR: While Linux is less susceptible to malware in some ways, it mostly boils down to Linux having a more technically minded userbase whereas Windows is a "mainstream" operating system.

Most Windows malware nowadays come from social engineering scams (complete this "captcha" by pressing Windows+R and pasting in this powershell script we conveniently put in your clipboard) or untrusted third party installers because Windows doesn't natively have a package manager. Like others have said, the old school self-propagating worms and drive by downloads that activate just by clicking on a link aren't really possible anymore (outside of state actors with unlimited budgets to buy zero days) unless your system or browser is horrifically outdated.

In terms of social engineering, Linux is not necessarily better at preventing it than Windows. In fact, sudo in Linux will unquestioningly delete the kernel and system software or make unlimited changes to them. Windows, for better or for worse (tbh more worse than better), uses TrustedInstaller to limit access to system files. Windows 11 won't easily let you delete or modify System32 for example, even if you're an admin. So it's in theory easier to do more damage to your system on Linux if you don't know what you're doing. But if someone is using Linux full time, they're most likely technical enough to not be fooled into running random untrusted bash commands.

The biggest thing is to be careful with those Linux terminal tutorial sites that have a "add to clipboard" button, they can put literally anything into your clipboard, including an enter key to run the script as soon as you put it in your terminal (though this may or may not be possible depending on your terminal app). Actually, they don't even need you to use their copy button. They can just set an event listener for control-C anywhere on their site and automatically replace the clipboard content. Just double check everything you copy before running it, especially since there's a lot of times where Linux users have to rely on obsecue tutorials hosted on untrusted websites.

You also don't really need to run untrusted installers on Linux because almost everything you need is in a properly moderated software repository, be it your native package manager, Flatpak, or Snap. Everything is signed by the authors and has a ton of eyes from the open source community on it. The only things to look out for is compiling something from GitHub, random AppImages, Elf binaries, scripts, and last but not least third party repositories that can be added as an installation source to your package manager/Flatpak/Snap. Basically, Linux gets most of its "doesn't get malware" reputation from the same place Mac does: you rarely have to manually download and run an executable from a random website, which is the norm on Windows. Add to the fact that even when that's needed, the Linux userbase is more technical and is more able to discern which sources are reputable and which are suspicious.

Another major source of malware is pirated versions of Windows or untrusted "license activators" from the internet. This just isn't a problem on Linux because there's no license to activate and it's free to begin with so there's nothing to pirate. And again, if someone is running Linux, they're probably technical enough to know not to run random pirated versions of paid software to begin with, helped by the fact that the vast majority of paid software is Windows only.

 

\\s

view more: ‹ prev next ›