GroggyGuava

The American left is globally considered to be on the right, so your "extreme wing" argument is comparing the far right to the middle right.

Which he literally answers in the comment you questioned him on. You asked him something after he explained what you then asked.

That's braindead, and not because I "disagree" with your question, whatever that means.

The sentence they wrote right before your quoted sentence answers your braindead question.

You need to expand on how learning from something to make money is somehow using the original material to make money. Considering that's how art works in general, I'm having a hard time taking the side of "learning from media to make your own is against copyright". As long as they don't reproduce the same thing as the original, I don't see any issues with it. If they learned from Lord of the rings to then make "the Lord of the rings" then yes, that'd be infringement. But if they use that data to make a new IP with original ideas, then how is that bad for the world/ artists.

Are you ok? You seem upset

Your first sentence describes your own comment.

Intentionally missing the point to try and make your own?

Right yah I felt like that was probably the case when I was typing that honestly, that's my bad, I guess I should've said only really started taking off months ago, and is still rather small.

Which is a big assumption to make on such a young site.

My comment threads are constantly broken for some reason, always all out of order

It only gets rid of ads.

Yah no shit I didn't say I'm starving bc of him. I asked for someone to make it make sense. Which you haven't, instead you went with "wah wah go use something else then" - really constructive conversation, why raise complaints about things that could be better? Why try to push for improvements in something you like/care about, that's what you're arguing for me to do. "Pay for it or shut up", how about I don't pay, and instead voice my opinion on the Internet like the sites designed for.