Didros

joined 1 year ago
[–] Didros@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

It is very simple. When you are worried about yourself and your own actions that is normal. When you are concerned about what others choose, that is conservatism.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 8 points 3 days ago

Person with very very minor role in failed franchise is making a new game as a job and being paid quite well to do more PR than work.

Yeah, people with jobs tend to do them.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

Well, as long as the public would be resistant to the expansion of the concentration camps. That should make up for the deaths.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 6 points 3 days ago

Capitalism forces companies to make stupid fucking decisions?!?! shocked Pikachu face

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago

Source is that Trump said he would... so no.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Whhhhat? The church dealt with all of that Yeats ago! /s

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, private prison company stocks sky rocketed when Trump won.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 6 points 5 days ago

He never was, and Harris was saying she was gonna build tge border wall

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 2 points 5 days ago

Oh without a doubt

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

Sounds like a lot of money. Could have housed and fed people with that.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 3 points 5 days ago

The path forward is we let them fucking fail. The whole premise of capitalism is you let industry fail. Stop bailing out billionaires.

 

I've recently seen a lot of videos from Hearthstone creators about the game The Bazaar created by an ex-hearthstone creator. They are selling closed beta access for around $30 for the basic pack, which gives you and a friend access to the game, as well as enough premium currency to unlock the three currently available heroes.

The value proposition isn't terrible in the gaming industry right now. Open beta is supposed to start in December (and totally check the game out. It looks pretty fun!) I'm just so tired of competent QA people being replaced with pay for early access to a "free" game.

The monetization of the game is very odd, but let's discuss how the monetization of a game affects what the developers are incentivised to put effort into. A free to play game is often monetized, similar to League of Legends, mostly through cosmetic overrides for in-game models. This is why most LoL patch notes are new champions that come out with a few skins, new skins for Lux and Ezreal, I mean existing champions. The incentive for the developers is to only make new skins, and on top of that, only new skins for very popular champions.

The Bazaar has a casual mode where if you get ten wins (like Hearthstone Arena), you get a ticket to play a game of ranked mode. You also get one free ranked ticket every day that is use-it-or-lose-it. And if you get enough wins in a ranked run, you are rewarded with treasure chests, which will contain a cosmetic.

The plan is for these cosmetic items to be tradable to other players. For a free to play game, this sounds like a paradise for botting. But also having a "ranked" mode just be the normal mode, but with the possibility of rewards is very silly to me in general. But having a ranked queue that costs money seems terrible. The incentive is for the developers to funnel as many people into paying for ranked runs as possible, but the rewards will decrease in value the more people receive them.

I don't have access to the game due to not wanting to spend on beta testing the game so close to Brighter Shores coming out and Oldschool Runescape Leagues later this month. But I'm not sure I would continue to play this game, considering I don't expect the game to succeed.

What other free to play games have monetization models that incentivise the devs to create the best possible gaming experience for the users? Or is that not sustainable in our current market?

view more: next ›