AttackBunny

joined 1 year ago
[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Clearly, even with the risk of death, people still have abortions, because they are a NECESSARY option. So, yeah it's already supported. All of that aside, why do you feel a need to punish women for nothing?

We have all heard of the "coat hanger abortions" performed everywhere. There are PLENTY of complications, namely death that arise from them, and yet, there are plenty of them happening daily.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Sure, HOWEVER, not being vaccinated puts society as a whole at risk. So, there are two options, be part of society, and get vaccinated, OR, don't get vaccinated, and don't be part of society. It's like wearing clothes in public. I sure as fuck don't want to wear clothes, like ever, but I do, so I can be part of society.

An abortion affects the mother ONLY. Not an apples to apples comparison at all.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We don't retroactively go and punish soldiers for setting mines, nor their commanders. So, no, it doesn't matter

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I respectfully disagree

this kind of reductionist summary of the very real conflict of priorities does not help the situation.

scientifically speaking, it's 100% accurate. Just because imaginary sky daddy tells some people that it's already a thinking, breathing, living person doesn't matter.

If being unborn really counted for nothing, we wouldn’t have any laws that restricted action based on long-term effect. (For example: laws to prevent climate change, to prevent cluster bombing, etc)

We don't really though. There are no real punishments for any of those actions, or anything to actually stop people from doing them. Yes, we do have laws saying you can go to jail if you do drugs while pregnant, BUT that's because there is an INTENTION to carry to term, and have an actual human happen, that will be great affected by those drinking/drug uses during pregnancy. If you are so early on that you can/are aborting, SCIENTIFICALLY it's a clump of cells, with no chance of being a human at that time.

The abortion debate is one of those uncommon instances where two conflicting rights meet.

yeah....... not really. If I'm forced to carry the parasite, I have the only say in what happens to it. I'm a living breathing already existing human being. The cells are not, and they cannot live outside of my body, so please take them out, and let them do their thing. Please let's see what happens.

However, it’s important to keep in mind that this decision isn’t a law of nature-- no more than “killing in self defense is allowed” is a law of nature; these are societal judgments.

nature is pretty indiscriminate in what it kills, but humans have added their own beliefs, which vary wildly from location to location. Regardless, the government and especially religion should have zero say. Abortion is a medical procedure, whether you, imaginary sky daddy, or some religious zealot thinks otherwise, and should be treated as such.

In fact, you probably believe this to a degree when it comes to “stand your ground” laws, as implementing in places like Florida or Texas.

Not related, so not really relevant to this topic, but generally, as far as I can tell, those laws are simply and excuse to kill for the sake of killing, and because the person already WANTED to.

It’s important to keep in mind that there is no objectively right or wrong answer; if there were, it wouldn’t be a conflict point.

Except scientifically, and objectively, there is a right answer. Certain people just don't like it, but it doesn't change the reality of it. That's like saying I don't like religion so no one can practice it. Doesn't work, does it?

It necessitates a dialog to convince people to agree with you, and dismissing the argument as foolish doesn’t do that, which means it will remain an “undecided” conflict point for longer than it needs to.

I'm pretty sure, based on historical data, and observation, we all know that a respectful discourse isn't going to happen, and if it did, it wouldn't sway the party in the wrong. Also, at this point, I do not believe there are any "undecided" people left. Either you follow reality and science, or imaginary sky daddy. Those seem to be the only two options left in US society. Other countries see the value, and necessity, and treat abortion as such, but we aren't one of those countries.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago (174 children)

But, but think about the clump of cells!!

I don't think anyone that's being honest thought anything different was going to happen.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@dekema Understood, but what I think people are trying to say is that TikTok isn't what you are looking for. It's trash content to keep people scrolling. Arguably all social media is that, but TikTok also has the "bonus" of being enough chinese owned that it's also a concerning data collection tool.

There may be a handful of creators on there, but think just about every link from tiktok you see. Personally, every time I see anything from there it's some dumb dance, some dumb car trend, or a new "challenge", or someone rambling about something they did/someone they encountered in public.

Unfortunately, if you want to make money, you need to whore yourself out on some form of social, and it's usually mindless useless content. And because you need to post constantly, to keep the algorithms happy, the content suffers. TikTok, Twitter, and Facebook being the worst currently, imo.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

So afaik love bombing requires you to be trying to get something out of it. Like if you were an asshole, and threw a chair through a window, and raged for an hour and stormed out of the house. Then you come with flowers, and candy, and some big elaborate date, in order to get them to forgive you and stay. That's love bombing. You're manipulating the person into thinking you'll never do it again, and you'll change, and all that BS.

IIRC it also applies to people who neg others. Say a whole mess of shitty things to someone, to bring their self esteem down, and then throw a compliment every so often, to keep them hooked.

It sounds like you really felt the way you said, and didn't have an ulterior motive, so love bombing doesn't apply.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Not only is attempted murder of a cop. It's on fucking video. There is literal undisputed (can't wait for the deep fake, or AI generated fake vid defenses incoming) proof he did it.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

It recently had been in CA

The exception being people who they don’t think will show up in court. These people would definitely fall in that category.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Aren’t they in CA? CA cash bail programs recently.

Guess these two fall into the exception part. Where no one is sure they will show up in court.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol. TikTok is absolutely NOT where you want to be then. I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about trends if you’re trying to live more intentionally.

As for giving up completely, imo it’s like people that go on hyper restrictive diets. It’s unrealistic. They fail every time. A reasonable amount of time on social is fine. It’s like ice cream, or a glass of wine. Once in a while is totally realistic. Spending all your time doing it is bad.

@pieceofcrazy

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, totally in agreement. Dude was always a horrible, dumb, asshole.

I mean, he wanted to blow a nuke up in the atmosphere of mars, to change said atmosphere to be habitable to humans.

He also overrode engineers on Tesla's autonomous driving, and forced them to only use cameras, and zero sensors (like every other manufacturer knows doesn't work)

He bought twitter for far too much, and we are witnessing him kill it slowly.

I could really go on and on. He's always been a moron, and a horrible person. I really don't understand why anyone ever thought otherwise.

Oh, and should we mention that he tried to cosplay as a poor person, who started these multibillion dollar companies from nothing (this one is kinda disputed, but the only source that claims that he really was broke is musk himself)

view more: ‹ prev next ›