AngryPancake

joined 9 months ago
[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The second one knocked it out of the park. Really well done successor.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

That's wild! I would have liked to join LD again as well, it's been ages. But life getting in the way.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Goodbye ssh access

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you only care about adding numbers, you can e.g. do that using water or marbles. You only need to build an XOR gate, an AND gate and an OR gate.

In case of water, the gate will have two inputs as water streams. They should be aligned so that when the streams hit each other, the water will flow into a cup in the center of the apparatus. When the streams don't hit each other, the water passes the first cup and flows into another cup on the bottom. Carrying the water out at the bottom is the XOR gate, carrying the water out at the center is the AND gate and both cups together are the OR gate.

Then it's just about setting up the circuit and that would be a full adder without electronics.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Especially painful on steam deck. If you get it working, it adds a good minute to the launch time

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe it's not automated and whoever is responsible isn't awake yet.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Your user is still linked to your home instance. If that goes down, you don't have access to it. You can still browse Lemmy from other servers.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago

Honestly, the small scale racism is a huge issue. These constant small arguments is what manifests it in people's heads.

But yeah Trump is an ass, fuck him.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Or right click the back button

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

I'll write an explanation here, but I'll try to answer all questions from the thread. Also quantum mechanics is complicated, so sorry for the long text.

Electron orbitals are weird and complicated, for hydrogen we can solve them analytically and depending on the quantum number of the energy levels we are looking at, they take the forms as in the picture on Wikipedia:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Hydrogen_Density_Plots.png/1280px-Hydrogen_Density_Plots.png

Now whatever energy levels and quantum numbers are, what we are seeing is the probability of the location of the outer most electron (ok hydrogen only has one).

To understand bonds, we don't really need the picture of orbitals, but what's important is understanding that electrons occupy shells. A certain number of atoms can fit into a shell and when it's full, the electrons start a new shell. It gets complicated quickly with more electrons, however in the simpler case, a shell can fit 2n^2 electrons, where n is the shell number. So for n=1, a maximum of 2 electrons can fit, for n=2, a maximum of 8 electrons can fit.

Shells want to be filled, so that leads to two possible bond types. If an atom with a free electron comes close to an atom that has a free spot for an electron, the electron can hop over to the other atom, at which point we have an ionic bond (the atom that loses the electron loses one electric charge and is thus positively charged, the other atoms gains an electric charge and is then negatively charged, so they want to be together).

Another option is covalent bonding, where instead of an electron jumping to another atom, the atoms actually share the electron.

Now do orbitals overlap? I wouldn't give that question a yes or no, because, at that level, we can't really separate atoms anymore. When the atoms are far apart we can draw separate orbitals for both, but when they get together, new orbitals form that is the solution of the electronic configuration of the new molecule we just created. It's more like the orbitals that we have get deformed into new orbitals.

[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I'd like to tinker with the hardware but unfortunately it's just not necessary. Love the device

view more: next ›