AdrianTheFrog

joined 2 years ago
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Hash them with the post ID appended, so a user can't be identified across posts

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Ok that makes sense

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Reminds me of the "U.S. Post: you have a USPS parcel being cleared, due to the detection of an invalid zip code address, the parcel can not be cleared, the parcel is temporarily detained, please confirm the zip code address information in the link within 24 hours" message I got with the totally not suspicious domain "usps.com-service.webnw.top/us" and the unnecessarily confusing instructions "Please reply with a Y, then exit the text message and open it again to activate the link, or copy the link into your Safari browser and open it"

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There are multiple similar subs on reddit as well though, often with very slightly different names

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

That's why I always go back in time to write all of my permanent messages into the cosmic microwave background at the start of the universe

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If they look at the "all" feed they'll see 90% of the same stuff from 90% of instances.

Once (from experience) they learn what they want from an instance, they can always switch.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

"Here's Lemmy. It's like Reddit. There's a bunch of different websites for it, but they all have basically the same people and posts on them. Just join one near you, if you don't like it you can always use a different one later"

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They don't really need to know about that until they have had time on Lemmy to hear about what those defederated instances actually do

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Dynamic streaming is common nowadays, as games have gotten large enough that not everything in a level can fit into memory.

I don't know about what is actually done in industry but I feel like most of the time you wouldn't bother with keeping dead instances unless instancing is shown to actually be a performance problem, which will probably not happen all that often

Godot for example doesn't have built in dynamic level streaming yet or a built in way to cycle through dead instances as far as I can tell, although I'm sure that wouldn't be hard to do with code

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe you would have an array of active enemies in RAM, and when enemies are killed they are removed from that array for example?

In a game like Minecraft for example, you definitely wouldn't want to store every single dead entity and its location when there can easily be thousands created and destroyed in a single second

It obviously depends on the game though.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I was looking at the savegames from the game control recently, it's kinda funny because you open them in notepad, you see a bunch of random gibberish from bad decoding (the game uses a proprietary save format) with the words "collected" "Collected" "unlocked" "available" "VariableRestoreHack" (??) "STATE_B_PUZZLE_SOLVED" "Powercore_Not_Attached" randomly interspersed

Like, surely there is a better way to store 2 state data other than an english word?

It does generally get longer as you play, but also "locked" just switches to "unlocked" for example when you unlock something

 

With the smaller 14b model (q4_k_m), just letting it complete the text starting with "why do I"

edit: bonus, completely nonsensical (?) starting with "I don't" (what could possibly be causing it to say this?)

 

I was thinking about how hard it is to accurately determine whether a screenshot posted online is real or not. I'm thinking there could be an option in the browser to take a "secure screenshot", which would tag the screenshot with the date, url, and whether the page was modified on your computer. It could then hash both the tag and the image data and automatically upload this hash to some secure server somehow. There would need to be a way to guarantee that only the browser could do this, or at least some way to tell exactly what the source was. I'm not much of a cryptography person, but I would be surprised if it isn't possible to do this. Then, you could check if the screenshot you see is legitimate by seeing if it's hash exists in the list of real hashes.

 

reference image if you have no idea what I'm talking about:

I know this is a minor nitpick, but it's something that annoys me.

I got this graphics card mostly because it was the best deal on Amazon at the time (gpu shortage), and I also thought it looked decent from the images they had. However, when I actually installed it, all I see is the relatively unattractive looking black metal backplate with some white text. The other side is always the side shown in the promotional images too - not a single one of the pictures in the Amazon listing even shows the side that you'll be seeing 99.9% of the time. Do they think everyone hangs their PCs above them from the ceiling, or has open-air testbenches? Why do they never even bother with the other side? I know they want the fans on the bottom so the cooling is better, but the air in front of the CPU shouldn't be that bad, a lot of cheaper GPUs don't need that much cooling, and a ton of people have watercooling now anyways so the CPU radiators just go on the sides.

 

my reasoning: the actual colors we can see -> the wavelengths that we can extrapolate to -> basically extrapolated wavelengths plus an 'unpure-ness' factor -> not even real wavelengths (ok well king blue and maybe lavender if I'm being generous could be)

 

Just 3% less votes than Jill Stein, and he dropped out 3 months ago

 

I've often seen this sort of thing in videos advertising GI in minecraft shaders, and tried it out in blender.

 

This is at JFK, does anyone know what they are used for? There wasn’t an obvious time when it was taking a picture.

 
 

Prompt: A cyberpunk scifi painting of a floating city in the air above the sea

It uses a new, fancier, 18GB text encoder (t5) to follow the prompt much more closely. It isn't perfect, but its much better than SDXL in my opinion. It does seem to be a bit worse at photorealistic subjects and has a tendency to create 1-pixel vertical lines.

Some other images:

impressionist, a woman sits in the middle of a crowded cyberpunk street, people bustling around, orange and blue glowing signs, warm atmosphere

a bright cinematic photo of a solarpunk city at midday, skyscrapers, steel, glass, vines and fields of vivid tropical plants

 

I get around 1 image every quarter of a second on my 3060. The quality isn't up to par with regular SDXL (not even close) but it follows prompts well and is extremely fast. Here are some of the best images in this batch:

Prompt: "impressionist oil painting, watercolor, a crying old southern man eats cheese at sunset in front of a futuristic dystopian cyberpunk city"

 

 

Material: 3D model: Original image:

view more: next ›