Technology

This is an excuse to lay off employees, no AI break through replaced good customer service this technology existed a long time ago that just put customers in an endless circle regurgitating policy disguised as customer service, this is to reduce production cost and the bottom line. this 'chatbot'/ai is an excuse to lower quality for a customer experience and lower production cost to increase/maintain profits while passing blame on the shitty ai/technology. (after they blame the do nothing employees and ppl realise what they replaced it with was shit/'AI')

this is not advancement/progression this is a regression

budget cuts for a dying corporation

edit: did my own LLM research

Shopify became noticably shittier when they started pushing their useless shitty app that just makes things more of a hassle and no businesses ever get better after they peak

Be interesting to see how LTT responds to this. Their whole online store is powered by Shopify.

All of the CEOs and C Suites generally, who are screwing over every human they have previously built positive relationships with, may be creating a vacuum for some bright activist investor type who despise these post modern C Suite’s lazy self-serving greed. Edit: this was just posted on Twitter, obviously I am not alone in my posted comment from yesterday. https://twitter.com/phantomblack691/status/1683127958888755201?s=46&t=0c17uBeIHaP3Nw63hslqAw

I really hope the paradigm shift happens soon. If it only takes a few devs to make a company run like this, there is no reason for the devs to work for these companies that churn them for imbecilic investors. The real "unnecessary overhead" is all of corporate America. We are a society of ship captains too stupid to realize they are piloting canoes.

Damn it. My shop has used Shopify for years. One reason I chose it was the excellent customer service and help I received as a new small business owner.

Greedy people at the top of companies are always trying to squeeze more money out of their operation, to the detriment of everyone.

Perhaps employees should co-own the companies they work for so they can be part of the decision-making process.