this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
303 points (92.4% liked)

Vegan

2966 readers
15 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelotron@midwest.social 58 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A vast amount of the Pacific Garbage Patch consists of discarded commercial fishing gear.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 24 points 6 months ago

Over three-quarters of the GPGP mass was carried by debris larger than 5 cm and at least 46% was comprised of fishing nets.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29568057/

[–] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

Commercial fishing 🤝 dumping horrific amounts of plastic waste in the ocean

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Im on board with both of these things. But if you try to invalidate peoples small victories with larger issues, that they have no direct control over, for no good reason, they will rightfully dislike you.

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

You do have direct control over fisheries as much as you do over straws. But indeed, don't invalidate. Say "if you like X, you might also want to do Y which has an even greater impact"

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But they do have a direct control over the fishing industry?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Direct control = if i could decide that the fishing boat doesnt go out tomorrow or how they do their fishing

Indirect control = i decide not to eat fish

You also only have indirect control over plastic straw production, but my point wasnt the "control over" part but the "let people have their small victories" part. If you actively harass people for doing good things, they will stop doing good things.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

in this case quite a number of people would want plastic straws back because the paper straws has been bringing a significantly worse experience. So yeah they do want this good thing to stop.

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What direct control do I have over the fishing industry?

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Changing from buying their stuff to not buying it maybe?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago

I can control the use and manufacture of straws as much as I can the use of plastic nets in fishing. I can reject straws and not eat fish, thus marginally reducing demand for both.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The straws are a win, a very very small win that we just stopped at. It's like we just said "mission accomplished" while tossing an empty plastic cup into the bin.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I feel you have to try hard to take that as the message here.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

They don't like us anyway so what do vegans care? Hahahaha

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It is really just a few countries