this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
77 points (88.9% liked)

politics

24609 readers
2317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

Suppressing protests at Columbia... famously a good idea.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

What’s it been, fifty years since the national guard has gotten to shoot protesting college students?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 year ago

But I assume they're totally fine with the Zionist counter-protesters surrounding them

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Republicans want to use good ol fashioned iron fisting against people expressing their God-given first amendment rights.

YeeHaw!

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago

The party of free speech

[–] athos77@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Neither of them have anything to do with New York - whatever happened to states' rights? The Constitution and the right to protest?

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Quick! Someone needs to shoot up a bunch of Kindergarteners so I can pretend to care about the Constitution again!

-Republicans who have a Constitution Decal on their Truck.

[–] leadore@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Those two (Tom "Long Neck" Cotton and Josh "Run Forest Run" Hawley) look so much alike I keep getting them mixed up.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't that fall under the jurisdiction of the Governor?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


are demanding President Joe Biden unleash the full force of the state’s National Guard to suppress pro-Palestinian student protests at Columbia University.

“If [New York City Mayor] Eric Adams won’t send the NYPD and [New York Governor] Kathy Hochul won’t send the National Guard, Joe Biden has a duty to take charge and break up these mobs,” Cotton wrote Monday on X, formerly Twitter, describing the protests as “nascent pogroms” against Jews — invoking the term used to describe historic massacres against Jewish communities.

Hawley was infamously photographed saluting protesters outside of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, hours before the riot that nearly usurped the Electoral College certification of Biden’s election.

Earlier this month, Cotton signed onto an amicus curiae supporting a Supreme Court challenge to the Justice Department’s ability to charge Jan. 6 defendants with obstruction.

The outsized death toll, which is largely comprised of civilians and noncombatants, is the result of indiscriminate bombing of the besieged territory, and severe restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid to the region.

On Monday Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), chairwoman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, penned an open letter accusing the university of violating Title IX by failing to suppress the protests.


The original article contains 805 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because they WANT him to lose the election...

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago