this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
311 points (99.1% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3880 readers
695 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.

Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!

Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.

Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Stamets@lemmy.world
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website
negativenull@lemmy.world
311
Battle of the Doctors (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by negativenull@lemmy.world to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I'm with some of the other folks around here: Pulaski was a better character. Conflict between the ship doctor and the captain makes for more interesting narrative opportunities, and Pulaski was great specifically because she was willing to stand up to Picard and be a pain in the ass.

Fans just didn't like her because she didn't immediately see Data as a person, but even that was interesting because not everyone would, and giving voice to that again created interesting ways to explore the implications of Data's existence.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fans just didn't like her because she didn't immediately see Data as a person

It wasn't just that she didn't immediately see Data as a person; it's that her first scene was so ham-fisted and poorly written. She made a specific effort to mock something she didn't even think was alive.

It would be equivalent of someone saying "Oh does my car not like that I left my lights on? Could it be that I offended it in some way?" It's an inanimate object, why would you even bother saying that? If you saw someone doing that you would think they are an idiot and an asshole, as they didn't miss an opportunity to be a dick even if the subject is an object performing its function.

I agree, Pulaski was far more interesting than Crusher. Pulaski butting heads with Picard? Going to be a great episode. Pulaski paling around with Geordie and Data? Going to be a great episode. It's just her first scene was so bad that it was memorable, which meant it took time to warm up to her and what she brought to the show.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

which meant it took time to warm up to her and what she brought to the show.

And some of us never got there. Pulaski reminds me of some of the worst people I've known, even after she's supposed to have warmed up to Data.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While i agree with all your points, the way she came across while not seeing Data as a person infuriated me. It's one thing to have a good philosophical debate, as ST fans we love a good debate, but the way she acted with Data just drove me crazy. You can disagree with an idea and not be a bigot.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And yet we know in Measure of a Man that Pulaski was far from unique in her views, and was in fact a) quite tame about it and b) ended up changing her mind, showing on-screen how a person can change in a positive way. That's a far more compelling (and realistic) message than everyone just unquestioningly accepting the one and only android in all of Starfleet holding a senior role on the Starfleet flagship.

Think of it like "The Devil in the Dark". It would've been incredibly boring if everyone just immediately accepted the Horta right off the bat instead of seeing it as an unthinking monster. The journey is in the message that you can come to understand something different from you and accept it not just in spite of those differences but for them.

Everyone simply accepting Data on the Enterprise right off the bat without question was, frankly, lazy writing. And they figured that out eventually, hence episodes like Measure of a Man.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I always felt Pulaski was Bones character all over again. I'm ok with the conflict part but prefer soft spoken character, it blends better with TNG plots full of ethics and moral dilemmas. Bones/Pulaski fit better in an action based series, with no room for psychological introspection and deeper characters.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Swap Bashir and Pulaski between TNG and DS9.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Ooh that would be cool

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Besides, they wasted a perfectly good plot twist that Pulaski is actually Thalassa secretly still in Ann Mulhall's body, and that she changed names to hide the slower aging.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I disliked Pulaski because she was written as a Mary Sue.

Picard needs heart surgery? Pulaski is the best heart surgeon in the galaxy. Virus that ages people? Pulaski wrote the definitive paper on Viruses. Riker's dad shows up? Oh Pulaski dated him. Geordi has problems with his visor? Pulaski had done several successful ocular implant surgeries.

It was ridiculous.

You can get away with giving a character one unique ability. But Federation's top heart surgeon, virologist, opthalmologist, and dates Riker's dad is the same person? That's bad writing.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

LOL you've described literally every doctor in Star Trek ever. I mean, Christ, they lampshaded this with McCoy when he exclaimed "By golly, Jim - I'm beginning to think I can cure a rainy day!" when he treated a fucking silicon rock monster.

Honestly at this point this is just making up reasons to be mad.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a huge difference between the Enterprise Doctor or Engineer overcoming odds and solving the problem and walking in saying, "I'm the Galaxy's expert in this." "Oh and I'm also the Galaxy's expert in this and that too."

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're right. In the former case it's utterly implausible that every ship doctor would not be an expert in a thing but still somehow be able to cure that thing. Every. Damn. Time.

At least with Pulaski they gave an excuse (well, assuming I buy your claims; frankly, I think you're overstating things quite a bit).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While I agree it is a bit much, I think I'm willing to lessen her sentence because Star Trek: TNG is full on hardcore competency porn. Everyone else on the show is an expert in exochemolinguistics, why shouldn't the chief medical officer of the Federation flagship have six different medical degrees?

A lot of my issue with Pulaski is meta rather than in-universe; I'm not so happy with my understanding of what was going on behind the scenes in seasons 1 and 2, why McFadden and Crosby left among them. And something about trying to play it safer with Bones McCoy 2.0 feels slightly cynical?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The difference is overcoming odds and succeeding as compared to walking into the scene as the Galaxy's foremost expert.

It's the difference between Geordi having to learn about warp engines from Leah Brahms and instead Geordi tells the Captain, "I'm the Federation's top expert on warp engines."

Oh Data has a problem, "I'm also Federation's top expert in cybernetics."

Time travel problem? "Oh I solved that 3 times on my last assignment. Do you want me to fix it?"

Worf's brother shows up. "I'm childhood friends with Worf's brother."

It's bad writing.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I assume you hated Spock, then. Buddy was literally an expert in everything! McCoy needs help reinstalling Spock's own brain? Spock is on it! Computer seems to show Kirk killed a guy by accident? Nbd, Spock is a computer expert, he'll figure it out with chess (did I mention he's a chess master?). Need to implode the engines to escape from a collapsing planet? Also warp engine specialist! Oh and he can play the piano, that Vulcan guitar thing, and also happens to be deeply knowledgeable in earth history and culture as the needs require (including being able to recognize Brahms handwriting by sight).

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Again, being competent isn't the same as being the Federation's foremost expert in the field.

When the Enterprise computer was going to get refit, Dr Daystrom came on board. Daystrom didn't say , "Oh Mr Spock is here! He wrote the book on duotronics that is still standard today!"

(This is what the virus researcher said about Pulaski about virus research.)

You are shown Spock overcoming the odds. With Pulaski, you are told she is the expert. It's bad writing.

Edit: It's also Spock is Vulcan with superior intelligence. Bashir could have pulled it off because he was genetically improved. Pulaski was human.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Now I'm certain you're just making up reasons to be mad.

Spock is repeatedly depicted as being an established expert across a truly improbable range of topics (including, of all things, brain reattachment surgery). Spock is to basically everything else what Kirk is to "talking computers into killing themselves".

If you can accept that you can accept Pulaski.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What you don't know is that those two were at it like animals every night and she transferred because even Riker was complaining about the sex noises.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago

It was making the ship list to the right on a regular basis. Navigation had to course correct every ten light years of travel to compensate.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 8 months ago (3 children)

they need an alt ending where she falls into an empty turbolift shaft

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Unpopular opinion, but I liked Pulaski. She didn't put up with bullshit, but she was also one of the only characters to actually have legitimate growth over the course of their time on the show, going from not respecting Data's sovereignty as a person to understanding why he was one.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (3 children)

And she was Star Trek alum. The only regular on TNG that had also been on the Original Series.

Pulaski was indeed good. But Crusher was better. Especially the v1.5 character that came back to the show. Full Commander, command experience, clever as fuck (solving actual murders and conspiracies), not being a doe-eyed soccer mom all the time.

Apart from the infamous candle fucking, her episodes are among the best of the series.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 months ago

"If there's nothing wrong with me... maybe there's something wrong with the universe."

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My conrade in Starfleet, this woman gonna bring spirits onto your ship if she can't get the Captain's attention.. She is a liability on any space vessel.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Idk why, but I heard this in my head with a Jamaican accent.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

she fucked herself with a candle?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well... it was a ghost inside a candle... that was actually an alien... that looked like a guy out of a romance novel... that also fucked her grandmother... but always as a glowing cloud of gas instead of the handsome guy... on Planet Scotland...

Let's just say it wasn't the best episode.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I have always hated that episode but you kind of have to respect how far the writers took it. Like one of those things you listed would be an episode. They shoved them all into one episode and still had a B plot that was commitment.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

And yet, it somehow wasn't the worst episode.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

+1 for Pulaski being a good chief medical officer. Personally, I would prefer her to Crusher, were I staffing a ship. (Nothing wrong with Crusher, I just like the cut of Pulaski's jib a little more.)

Edit: note that in real life McFadden strikes me as an absolute badass in a way they never let her character be.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No nonsense and you dont have to worry about the captain porking the chief medical officer. But then again, romance between the Captain and chief medical officer is a proud Enterprise tradition.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 12 points 8 months ago

We all really know how "bones" got that nickname.

[–] rob64@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago

100% agree. My issue was mostly that her character was too similar to Bones.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

Fucked 0 ghosts though.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's just that the character didn't have much going for it.

She didn't like technology, seeing how she refused to use the transporter and the way she treated Data.

But it is a scifi show, technology is like the main thing.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So, just like Bones?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And that was really my gripe. She was basically just genderbent McCoy. At least to start. They did enough with her character that she was more than that by the end, but using that as a starting point just rubbed me the wrong way.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah but most of the characters on TNG started out as two dimensional caricatures of what they actually became. I don't think the Pulaski character is any more deserving of criticism than early Picard or Riker or, heck, Data himself (who I'd argue started off as Albino Spock).

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

McCoy didn't like technology either.

[–] kellyaster@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Holy crap, originalucifer, I understood that reference. Muldaur's character Roz Shays was killed off in LA Law that way...by inadvertently walking into an empty elevator shaft! The character was prickly and not well-liked, but it was shocking AF because it was in the middle of a scene and came out of nowhere. Shit, I haven't thought about that for a while.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] kellyaster@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

That's it! That's the one, hahaha

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Then there would be another ghost to .....

[–] teft@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Gates McFadden actually choreographed that dance that JL performs.

[–] ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

I can hear the song in my head when I see that image.

load more comments
view more: next ›