this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
774 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

4368 readers
2219 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 300 points 7 months ago (3 children)

One thing LotR does very well: lets men show emotions that aren't anger. Frodo smiles, shouts Gandalf's name excitedly, cracks a joke with him, and gives him a hug. That's how you know they're old friends.

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 105 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I can only tell if men are friends if they share a bicep-flexed hand clasp.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 44 points 7 months ago

You son of a bitch! 🤝💪

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They need to shoulder bump too, otherwise they could just be former colleagues or perhaps two men who met for the first time yesterday.

load more comments (1 replies)

And a solemn nod that sums up everything they both experienced in the 10 years since they last saw each other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Go back, Sam! I'm going to Mordor alone.
Of course you are. And I'm coming with you!

It always makes me tear up. Fantastic films.

Conversely, the worst film I've seen in recent years must be the third(?) fantastic beasts film. I still have no clue what actually happened or what it was trying to tell. It was such a jumbled mess, and them changing out the actor of the main villain for the third time didn't help much.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, if made in last 10 years, they might have turned Aragorn into some kind of Conan the Barbarian ripoff. Not necessarily, for example, RDJ’s Iron Man has a lot of complex emotions and nice arc. But, they could. I mean, look at Galadriel in Rings of Power.

[–] gladflag@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

Iron man came out it 2008!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 99 points 7 months ago (14 children)

One thing I've noticed with newer movies is they do a lot more "tell, don't show" than old movies.

For example, compare the live action Disney Cinderella to the original animated version. The live action version is mostly a voiceover telling the story of Cinderella. They literally say "Her stepsisters weren't very good at art or music" and then have a scene showing them being bad at art and music. The animated version spent the first 20 minutes or so like a Tom & Jerry cartoon.

And this is across movies. I watched Predator recently and there wasn't a lot of exposition about how they're there to fight communists or whatever. You pick that up in snippets of dialog in between the action.

It really does feel like movies are dumbing down.

[–] dumbass@lemy.lol 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

One thing I've noticed with newer movies is they do a lot more "tell, don't show" than old movies.

Main character seeing old friend: Well if it isn't my old friend Daniel, we used to roam these streets as kids, I used to have dinner at your house every day, you were like my brother, I would have done anything for you, I haven't seen you since our other old friend Jake died mysteriously, remember when we used to play videogames all night and made that life long pact that if "HE" returns we will do what it takes to send him back to the world where he emerged from when we were kids and lived right next door to each other, our mothers were best friends until the incident but they never stopped us from being life long best friends forever, we used to play in the streets all night, me you Daniel and Chris, the rat Pac they called us, best friends for life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cole@lemdro.id 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I feel like Dune was a good outlier to this. It's the only movie I've seen in theater in the last few years and I really enjoyed not having everything explained to me

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 90 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

But Lord of the rings is a modern movie?

[–] Triple_B@lemmy.zip 168 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Is a movie that came out 23 years ago still modern?

[–] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 223 points 7 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 40 points 7 months ago

Yes, the word we are searching for is contemporary. Technically all films are modern, but not contemporary. Though modern has expanded definition to include it generally as well but I like to explore language :)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sockman@sh.itjust.works 41 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I mean it was filmed 25 years ago, I guess it depends on your definition of 'modern'

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 34 points 7 months ago

Made in the current millennium.

Oh fuck.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Quarter of a century ago

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

What do you mean? Of course it isn't a modern movie, it was filmed during the Third Age.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 64 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 62 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 46 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 54 points 7 months ago
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You know what pals, I think it might just have been a good movie

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 56 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the biggest reason is that the actors were allowed to act together. Modern movies use so many digital effects that actors aren't even on set together sometimes. It's hard to have the same emotions looking at a green screen and a guy in a morph suit.

[–] JonnyJest@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Just for the first one, right? I remember Ian Mckellen had a breakdown on set because he was sitting in front of the table at Bag End with nothing around him but green screen and was struggling without any other actors.

[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

IIRC that was on the set of one of the Hobbit movies.

The Lord of the Rings was shot mostly using practical effects.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tok@lemmy.zip 56 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Gandalf's actor really helps.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sir Ian Mckellen is great, I love that him and Patrick Stewart and good friends as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] goatbeard@lemm.ee 56 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Howard Shore is the answer

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is an answer I'm not seeing here enough. The score for LotR just FORCES you to feel the feelings. Don't wanna be happy? Too bad, we're in the Shire bitch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 43 points 7 months ago

Show, don't tell

It works wonders

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the problem is that a lot of modern shows/movies spend 2 hours explaining a characters backstory before you give a shit. there’s also a lot of “tell, don’t show” going on

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago

Execs thinking everyone's as vacant as they are.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's worth noting that the Lord of the Rings in book form is very long because it goes into so much depth about each character's history. One of the things that the author intentionally did was world building. If you wanted to get the whole plot line in, you could do so in a third the length.

So then when it was adapted to movie format, you had three things going for it. First, a lot of people read the books and loved them, second, the cast and crew had a lot to work with, and third, there was ample budget.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They'd rather have the protagonist run around screaming like a moron for 20 minutes for comedic effect instead instead of putting any effort into developing characters

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (6 children)

This is how I felt when I tried to watch Rogue One. It's part of one of my favorite franchises yet it is also an entire feature length film without one single character in it who I give a shit about.

It's maddening.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Rogue One was better than most of the drivel Disney has put out. Thank god there were finally some new characters. anitnal revolves around the same 3 fucking families.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

I actually did enjoy Andor a lot. That was why I tried watching Rogue One again, since I thought I might like it better with the added context, but I still just got bored

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Raxiel@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They are the archetypes all other fantasy archetypes are based on. Of course you know them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

a lot more care was taken with movie production in general in prior years than now and it shows

[–] 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Eh, I think it's more related to survivorship bias of the movies we remember. Most movies from decades ago were utter trash then too, we mostly remember the good ones while most of the rubbish fades away and is forgotten.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

It helps that Sir Ian McKellen is a huge teddy bear with a heart of gold and he would hug anyone that sincerely, whether he knew them or not.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'd say most of the time it's an age thing the younger we are the easier impressed/amazed we are. growing older makes us sometimes cynical sometimes overloaded with imagery. The more you've seen the harder it gets to be impressed by stuff, cause you have seen so much. And we keep fond memories of the things we liked as kids and teenagers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Good acting.

load more comments
view more: next ›