this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
485 points (99.4% liked)

News

22890 readers
3625 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge has ruled that a southern Oregon city can’t limit a local church’s homeless meal services.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke found that an ordinance passed by the small city of Brookings, on the southern Oregon coast, violated the religious freedom rights of St. Timothy’s Episcopal Church, KGW reported. He issued his opinion on Wednesday.

The 2021 ordinance limited the church’s homeless meal services to two days a week, and required a permit to serve free food in residential areas. It was passed in response to resident complaints.

The church sued the city in 2022, saying the ordinance violated its right to freely practice religion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImperialATAT@lemmy.world 188 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I wish more people expressed their faith by caring for people.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If only they had a role model that would have taught them that!

Maybe they could have written it down in a book they could turn to for guidance.

Or if they would hold weekly meetings to discuss it.

🤣

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Think of the following this person would have had if they had been killed for their teachings.

They would have become a martyr and an example for others for years, decades, centuries to come.

[–] match@pawb.social 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about Che Guevara, right?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 7 points 5 months ago

What other bearded champion of the downtrodden and resistor of imperialism could we be speaking of?

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Couple thousand years tops.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Plenty do. You just don't associate with that segment of society and it doesn't make headlines.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I took it as picking on the hypocritical people, not all churchgoers.

I'm actually surprised how pro-church this thread has been compared to most posts. Even some apparent church-haters have given the church credit in this thead.

[–] IonAddis@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a number of people who might have stayed religious if their religion actually focused on helping people and wasn't full of hypocrites.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My 2 best friends are really heartbroken lately and have greatly reduced their participation at their church due to much of the money going to a few select families of higher ups for things not even remotely mission related.

They've donated 10% of their income for years and worked on many projects and events, but it makes them feel like crap to see things run inappropriately.

I'm not religious and would generally refer to myself as agnostic, but it sucks to see them get hurt spiritually by their church, as that's kinda the opposite reason as to why it exists.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They finally woke up, which is great for them. Now they will experience a period of trauma as they re-evaluate their lives and identities. It's a hard process but they will be happier on the other end than before starting this journey.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's a hard process but they will be happier on the other end than before starting this journey.

Not necessarily. I've been through this and it's a lot ... a loss of community, loss of friends, nevermind the exhaustion from having your mind in conflict for months/years before you actually leave. And then having to develop new community and new friends without the history you had with the old.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I had the extreme misfortune to be born a gay person in the late 1970s to future Trump voters. I have extreme personal experience on this subject. It is traumatic, it is hard. But you come out of it with a far stronger sense of identity than most people develop and those you surround yourself with are by choice rather than by default.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It's because people like seeing people do good things, especially when the bad people get it stuck to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 98 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I looked up where this ordinance came from.

From AP

The ordinance against serving more than two free meals a week came in response to a petition from people living near the church, who said the church’s programs were creating public safety problems, Jefferson Public Radio reported.

The petition, which refers to the people around St. Timothy’s Episcopal Church as “vagrants” and “undesirables,” was signed by 30 people.

The town has about 7000 residents if you want to get an idea about what I'm percentage of the residents seem to find this to be a problem.

The church website claims they serve 210+ meals a week. Even if we assume everyone comes back for every meal, that's 35 people.

So if we look to serve the greatest good, it seems helping the homeless helps more people than if they were to help the judgemental NIMBYs.

From the in OPs post:

The city is currently asking the church to stop shower and advocacy services also bringing in homeless people into the neighborhood.

A church not bathing and protecting the poor really does seem to go against what I feel what most would say a church should stand for. I'm going to side with the church here.

[–] MicroWave@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Kudos for doing additional research and sharing it with sources!

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

I find things like this to be a fun exercise of Google Fu.

They're usually so thinly veiled attempts at prejudice or racism you can let the facts do all the talking just by following back article links a few steps to get great quotes and numbers to show these people for who they are.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For reference, Brookings is a little podunk town along the coast way down in the corner of Oregon near the California border. It's highly unlikely that these homeless people are coming in from out of town since it's far from any large city, so the people that are being attracted to this church already live in Brookings.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My thought as well when looking at the photo in the wiki when I grabbed the population count.

You never know though, those mountains could be full of phantom homeless!

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It looks like a nice enough place.

It also looks pretty rich.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

City-Data

There are over 60 households with income under 30k, so more evidence the people at the soup kitchen arent outsiders.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that plot says it all. The distribution is skewed to be wealthier than the average to the point that there are twice as many families making >200k than making 30k.

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago

trans graph trans graph

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You make the bold assumption those advocating for this consider the homeless “people”

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I try not to be tooooo judgemental in my reporting.

I'd love to see an AITA post from one of these people though!

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I used to love reading that on reddit, but when I subscribed to it here my feed was immediately swamped with AITA ... so I unsubscribed.

An occasional read is fine, but too much makes it seem like we're all myopic selfish ijits that, although it may be true, does not give me hope for our survival.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I normal don't read that type of thing, but if just be curious to see how these people justify wanted to back homeless people getting fed and cleaned up by the church.

Most of the Reddit ones I felt were fake to begin with, and there's enough real negative stuff I need to read to stay informed that I didn't need the negativity for "fun."

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A church should stand for whatever the tenants of the religion is. Christian is common in the us and generally holds help the poor as a tenant (as do several others) but tht doesn't mean they all do.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I agree. I was just saying that it does indeed sound like what a church should be doing and the town is wrong for trying to make them stop doing these things. If the homeless were indeed doing bad things, I'm sure there were existing laws that could have stopped them, but since there were no violations, I presume, they had to invent new laws they would be in violation of.

(Polite correction for you also: a tenant is someone who rents or occupies someone else's tenements (a house/dwelling/residence), while a tenet is a principle or belief)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago (4 children)

On the one hand, I'm happy for this ruling.

On the other hand, the church shouldn't have to do it in the first place because a government that actually cared about its citizens wouldn't let any of them go hungry.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

This government actively worked to prevent it.

I could give them the benefit of the doubt and say that the government was trying to get religion out of the job of taking care of citizens while setting up a city food bank... but I won't because it was in response to a petition signed by 30 people (out of 7000).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's amazing here is that some Karen/Chad had to complain about it to other Karens and Chads who then enacted this hateful law.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

What's amazing here is that a judge thinks feeding people is a religious belief.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't see that as a stretch. Religions throughout history have held that we must act altruistically and help others, though adherents often don't respect that part of it all. For reference, I am a strict atheist.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Religions throughout history have held that we must act altruistically and help others, though adherents often don’t respect that part of it all.

Yep. The Fourth Pillar of Islam is to give to the poor. The House of Saud couldn't give less of a shit about the poor.

Saudi Arabia has crippling poverty and people living in slums.

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/12/23/vision-2030-and-poverty-in-saudi-arabia

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Certainly makes more sense as a religious belief than not giving employees birth control.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago

This quickly upset Rev. Lindley from St. Timothy's Episcopal Church, who said feeding people is an essential part of their faith.

"That's the way we express our faith: by caring for people who are on the margins, especially people who are hungry," he said.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/homeless/brookings-church-wins-lawsuit-city-serving-free-meals/283-23539b57-8b1d-4fb7-b9a9-4d06c8242e97

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago

But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. For you will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”

Luke 14:13-14

Jesus replied, “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who stripped him and beat him and departed, leaving him half dead. Now by chance a priest was going down that road, and when he saw him he passed by on the other side. So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. He went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he set him on his own animal and brought him to an inn and took care of him.

Luke 10:30-37

Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal.

Matthew 6:19-20

But if anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God's love abide in him? Little children, let us not love in word or talk but in deed and in truth

John 3:17-18

I would argue NOTHING is more central to Christianity than helping the homeless. And that's before we start getting into comparative religion and finding that almost every religion emphasizes enlightenment coming from giving compassion to those that have nothing

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

It absolutely is if you follow the word of Christ. Unfortunately, most self-proclaimed Christians reject the word of Christ.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 17 points 5 months ago

For once I'm on the side of church. Fuck that city for even passing such an ordinance in the first place.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Get fucked Brookings, I hope none of you hate-filled shitheads considered yourself a Christian.

Cause you ain't

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's only 30 people out of 7000 upset, so maybe don't raze the town yet. 🤔

Check out my other comment for some more details.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

maybe don't raze the town yet. 🤔

How ELSE do you suggest we spend Easter? Painting "rabbit" eggs and revering an ancient zombie? 😛

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As long as those rabbit eggs don't go to feeding the homeless! Otherwise we'll have to fine you for that.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago

what if we just throw them at the NIMBY's houses

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenAlex@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

The fact that this went to court in the first place is just insane. This was an attempt at the removal of freedom for cruelty's sake.

load more comments
view more: next ›