this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
239 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2773 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago

Take all his money and his government pension as well.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Some real winners in my state. :(

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't feel bad, we all have losers

[–] Starb3an@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I'm from Texas. 90% of the people here are shit.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)

When did we decide that politicians can say whatever the fuck they want without consequences? Same goes for “news channels”

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When the fairness doctrine was removed and Republicans took more power in the 90s

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago

'We' didn't. Hence his being sued for it.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

When their feet are held to the fire the copypasta response is "I was merely stating my opinion, no reasonable person would think it a fact"

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Daily beast... why didn't you word the title

GOP Rep Sued For Falsely Claiming 'Illegal Alien' Was Chiefs’ Parade Shooter

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because they are two separate claims, both equally incorrect

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

fucking horrible sentence

police sued as they claimed person stole things, arsonist

[–] digdug@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In headlines, a comma is often used in place of "and", so it should be read as "GOP Rep sued for falsely claiming man was Chiefs' parade shooter and illegal alien"

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah I understand this. This particular headline reads like shit.