this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
192 points (84.8% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember when Trump said "America First" and everyone cried? Pepperidge Farms remembers..

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 95 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Okay but you SHOULD be doing something about the fucking cartels...speaking as a Mexican American

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like they are. They're going to let America fight its drug war in America.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They're not though, they have constantly capitulated to the cartels over the last few years and more. The cartels are literal terrorist scum and should be wiped the fuck out

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Except it isn't that easy to just "wipe them out". It'd be like dealing with a very well armed, very large resistance movement and would probably start a civil war. Without support from somewhere (like the US) it would be political (and probably regular) suicide

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

with a lot of Chinese gangs helping them

[–] statist43@feddit.de 5 points 7 months ago

And american institutions.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 50 points 7 months ago

What's with OP's pro-Trump editorializing? How does this article possibly serve as a defense of Trump's fascist "America First" policies?

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Mexico should legalize all drugs.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 45 points 7 months ago (1 children)

USA should legalize all drugs.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Everywhere should legalize all drugs.

Tax that shit and put the money into rehab and education. Prohibition has only ever benefited criminals.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah, decriminalise all drugs sure.

But shit like fentanyl, krokodil, etc. shouldn’t be actively promoted through ease of access.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is taking fentanyl or krokodil in world where uncut medical-grade opiates are available. Hell, even fentanyl can be dosed safely if it isn't coming from the unregulated black market.

Full legalization, full-stop. Drugs are so dangerous because we prohibit the existence of a safe, regulated market.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

How the hell do you dose fentanyl safely outside of a clinical context? You cannot discern a lethal dose from a nonlethal dose with the naked eye.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Legalized doesn't mean unregulated, people went blind during prohibition due to dangerous moonshine but it's incredibly rare now as it's brought from licensed manufacturers.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

Tbh it's even rare with moonshine now. Idk if it's just the internet making knowledge more widely accessible but now people know to throw out the methanol (or "foreshots") for blinding reasons, and if you want it to be good throw the heads and tails too.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's a property of fentanyl itself. I'm saying that outside of a clinical context, you don't have the instrumentation necessary to dose it.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

I'm suggesting reputable businesses could sell dosed mixtures just like they do in a clinical setting. A pill or solution with the appropriate amount.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

What the hell part of "regulated" was so hard to understand?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're ignoring the part where they said that no one would be taking fentanyl because other opiates would be available. It was literally the first sentence.

People don't typically take it recreationally on purpose; it's usually because a low level dealer cut the drug and added fentanyl to it.

[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

There are people on the street nowadays who prefer rent over heroin. It sounds crazy to non addicts, but the high is better for less money and it might actually be safe for people to knowingly buy fent and attempt correct dosing themselves rather than dosing for heroin but having cent laced.

Like, shit, that is dark and evidence the drug war has failed.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

With regulated doses, probably in pill form, like any other fucking drug? Obviously they wouldn't be selling pure fentanyl powder

[–] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The problem is, unless something is done about the cartels before hand, all that is going to do is legitimize them.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When your entire industry is illegal in almost all of the world, it suddenly becoming legal tends to hurt the black market very badly.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They should be granted amnesty in exchange for disarmament, among other things to drag them into legitimacy and abiding rule of law. It would have to be an undertaking comparable in scope to denazification post-WWII though.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago

Legalizing drugs doesn't mean there are no regulations. The FDA would have to control the quality of the drugs, and I bet the cartels don't exactly have quality control.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Cartels make an estimated $20-30 billion a year selling drugs to the U.S.

If the FDA regulates and we make our own, you just cut out all that money from them. Their influence goes down greatly. Also feeds the money back into our economy and the taxes on it can help us line our politicians pockets, oops I mean help fund healthcare

[–] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but the comment I'm replying to specifically said mexico should legalize, that wouldn't change the us demand at all.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

He said that, then put Trump first. What did he do for America besides racist rhetoric, a few miles of border wall that apparently doesn't work, and fast tracked a COVID vaccine you won't take?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago

Mexico cutting off its nose to spite its face.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

I think it's gone under the radar for most people just how massive and powerful the cartels have gotten over the last 10 years, all aided by crypto. Now that they don't have to worry about trucking dollars over borders, they can basically operate like multinational corporations

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“Of course we are going to cooperate in fighting drugs, above all because it has become a very sensitive, very sad humanitarian issue, because a lot of young people are dying in the United States because of fentanyl,” the president said.

Asked about those comments at the time, residents of one town in the western Mexico state of Michoacan who have lived under drug cartel control for years reacted with disgust and disbelief.

López Obrador has also made a point of visiting the township of Badiraguato in Sinaloa state, the home of drug lords like Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzman, at least a half dozen times, and pledging to do so again before he leaves office in September.

But it did note the U.S. Treasury Department announced sanctions Friday on a Sinaloa Cartel money-laundering network in which the proceeds of fentanyl sales were used to buy shipments of cell phones in the United States, which were then sold in Mexico.

John Kirby, spokesman for the White House National Security Council, credited “strong partnership with the government of Mexico, with which we coordinated closely and for which, we are grateful,” in investigating that case.

The cartels control increasingly large swathes of territory both in northern Mexico — their traditional base — and in southern states like Guerrero, Michoacan, Chiapas and Veracruz.


The original article contains 1,055 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!