The Signal messenger and protocol.

1647 readers

1 users here now

https://signal.org/

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

max@lemmy.ml

Usernames are now rolling out to everyone using Signal version 7.0! (mastodon.world)

submitted 8 months ago by celmit@lemmy.ca to c/signal@lemmy.ml

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] VEXdotblue@kbin.run 9 points 8 months ago

This could be a helpful thing, as I know I don't always like sharing my Phone Number with people.

[–] bestusername@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I don't understand the hype; how many people are chatting with people they don't know on Signal?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With usernames now it would be a better option. Before you had to share your phone number and hence your name

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You'd still share your name, no? As far as I understand it, these usernames only serve to get in contact, nothing more

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You'd share a username, which is way different if you ask me. I don't mind sharing my username, Kusimulkku, here but I wouldn't want to share my phone number and real name.

If you use the username to get into contact then your phone number isn't visible to them iirc. Same other way around, your username isn't visible to people you've got into contact with a phone number. So no need to worry about your phone number leaking or your friends and family seeing that you also go by "MonsterCock2000" or something.

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What I mean is that the username only serves to connect two users. But the profile they then see of each other is their standard Signal profile, with whatever name and other info it contains.

At least that's how I understood their blog post

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I think that might be true, but you could just have your first name as your name or something less private than full name + phone number etc.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 8 months ago

That was exactly my first thought. Might be something for various underground groups, but the normal use case seems to be just regular communication among friends & family.

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For me it can replace DMs everywhere. Put your username in your profile and get actually secure DMs.

[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

But wouldn't that just put you at risk of spam and other malicious messages?

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Don’t accept the message/block them? Same as any other DM system. Or just change your username.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] mac@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't this what Matrix was for?

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Matrix isn’t private at all. All metadata is shared+stored by both your server and mine (no sealed sender). Encryption is worse (no double-ratchet) and there’s no guarantee of encryption at all (some clients don’t even offer it). It’s also a lot harder to get set up and IMO the clients are much worse.

[–] mac@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Well then. This is useful information.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 1 points 8 months ago

I'm going to put a UN or QR code on my website for another form of tech support. (Think of WhatsApp numbers)

load more comments