this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
95 points (92.0% liked)

World News

32956 readers
1292 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

powder shortage

Concerned Guy Fawkes is concerned

[–] intelshill@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

EU bans China cotton imports for "human rights"

EU shocked when China ends cotton exports to the EU and the EU can't produce gunpowder (which needs cotton)

I know this may seem unusual, but actions have consequences

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is normal. Upscaling any production will show you where the bottlenecks in your supply chain are.

It is shitty in the current context, but still banning products due to human rights abuses is a good thing.

Now the aim is to resolve the bottleneck post haste.

Your entire post reads as an accusation, the quotes around human rights makes it seem you think it's nonsense.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because it is. Regardless of if there are actual abuses or not is completely missing the point, this is a pattern of abuse from the right where they'll bullshit up a reason for them to do the things they wanted to do anyway. 99.99% of the time the "abuses" are just outright fabrications. Just look at the Uighur narrative; at first the US literally pulled it out of their ass to distract from the very real fascist radicalizing they were doing in the area, and it's been slowly crumbling as more and more of the "evidence" they provided turned out to be complete and utter bullshit. It was never about the Uighurs, these same people are celebrating the decimation of Muslims in Gaza to this day.

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Have you ever been to Xinjiang?

No? Oh.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

Not OP, but my uncle went there a while back.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, Ohkay. One of those. Thanks for the clarification.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 18 points 11 months ago

img

Hrm, maybe billionaires buying up all of the sources of media MIGHT have some sort of... what was that word again?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago

Gunpowder still needs cotton? I thought that was an old-timey thing.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is making me reassess Russia's prospects in an all out war with NATO. If they can't supply Ukraine alone as it is, how will they supply a war machine for an entire continent when trade is even more limited?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 11 months ago

NATO's strength has been that the USA is in it. European countries have generally let their militaries atrophy since they could usually rely on the USA providing higher level military functions and general deterrence.

Russia would get crushed quickly in a conventional war versus an American led NATO. Russia has a decent shot at winning a war against an Americaless NATO.