this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
532 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3848 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 106 points 1 year ago (6 children)

There's a blind side in America when it comes to acknowledging the primary role of racism and white supremacy that drives Trump's base and the right-wing ecosystem

The only “blind side” that I’ve observed since Trump entered politics is from journalists and media corporations that continuously bend over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt, while doing literally the opposite for people on the other side of the spectrum like Sanders or AOC.

[–] WagesOf@artemis.camp 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's class warfare and the media is entirely on the oligarchy side.

You’re not wrong.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

You’re right!

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. Even those who vote for him and his like and then disingenuously claim ignorance of racism and bigotry will actually acknowledge it behind closed doors and say it's "strategic".

Which is the dumbest shit I've heard.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not dumb, it's their goal. They want genocide and to turn the U.S. into a white supremacist shithole.

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, that goal sounds pretty dumb to me. So that's where I'm coming from as it being the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

It's like these people never emotionally matured past toddlers.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I think it's telling that Chuck Todd called Sanders supporters "brownshirts" but didn't say anything close to that about the January 6 insurrectionists.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh but haven't you heard? Right wing views are always silenced! /s

As usual, it’s all projection 🙃

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

That's because Republicans played the long con.

They pretended to Champion fairness for so long, claimed that they were being unfairly discriminated against and that the media how do liberal bias. The result is that is now the media is too afraid to criticize the right for fearing that the liberal media stick will be used to hit them again.

It was never about ensuring an equal dialogue, it was about coming up with a standard where no matter what the right wing does, whatever the Democrats do has to be as good or as bad, regardless of what it is.

That's how you get "both sides are the same!" Nonsense

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/cKUaqFzZLxU?t=14

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 87 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When Donald Trump - the undisputed Republican frontrunner - is running to be president to avoid jail time and general responsibility for his crimes, you know this country is in trouble.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That year is just a slow burner

[–] SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo 10 points 1 year ago

Worse, it's 2020.

[–] whatisallthis@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politics in America is basically just like everything else. It’s just a brand people adhere to regardless of who works there. It’s the fast food of government.

If you like McDonalds better than Burger King, that’s where you’re gonna go. You don’t care who the manager of the McDonalds is. It doesn’t impact your decision.

That’s American politics now.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The headline implies that they're indifferent to the country's welfare, but in reality, they're actively hostile to it. They're fine wrecking the economy if it makes them richer and/or leads to a Biden defeat in 2024. They're fine destroying public education if it lets them be "anti-woke" or push more people towards charter schools (thus further giving a leg up to people from rich backgrounds). They're fine ignoring the climate catastrophe if it makes their rich donors and dumbass voters happy.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

That sounds like indifference to me. They are “fine” with wrecking stuff, but that’s not their goal. Their goal is more power, more money, more… whatever. They are 100% indifferent to the countries welfare. At least that’s what it feels like to me. It’s definitely still bad, as indifference to other peoples suffering is a pretty crappy way to be.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Starting with a test on basic constitutional rights would be a start. It'll be nice if politicians actually know basic 5th grade material like this.

Then we can move on to other tests to weed out the old and decrepit. Memory test. Drivers test. If they can walk a mile.

And lastly a test asking them basic things. For example: How much does a sandwich cost? If they say $0.50 or $600 dollars, we know they're not fit.

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I mean it’s one banana, Michael. What could it cost, $10?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

The problem isn't that they don't know things. It's that they don't care.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be honest, all those tests plus a net worth requirement under 1 million (including their home value) would be nice too.

We need people who actually know what it's like to live like everyone else.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know I'm upper middle class, but $1 million sounds too low these days. Especially if you want someone highly educated. I just had a state university education and military experience and with the rate I'm saving for retirement I'm protected to be more than that $1 million. I'm not trying to brag, I'm trying to say that I hope the people running the country would be better educated and more qualified than me.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just an example number. That's still really high compared to the median net worth of the US being $141,000. And the 90th percentile household wealth was 1.4 million in 2020.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, but I do want the people running the country to be in the top 10 percentile at least as far as qualifications go. Which doesn't always translate to wealth, but has a pretty strong correlation.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'll go $10 million, no higher!

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

1 million might be a tad on the low side. If you own a nice 3 bedroom 2 bath family home depending on location that could be $500k or even $700k all on its own. It doesn't take much to get to 1 million from there. Toss in a couple nice but not fancy cars and that's another $50k easily if not $100k, then the value of all your other possessions, and maybe a decent retirement account and you're basically there.

2 million on the other hand, and that's well into "rich" territory (but sadly barely even moves the needle of the ultra wealthy like the Koch brothers or Jeff Bezos).

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How much a sandwich costs depends entirely on where you're buying the sandwich, though.

Ask someone from Rochester New York and someone from New York City how much a sandwich costs, and you're going to get wildly different answers, and that's the same state

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Someone from Rochester would probably be buying a Garbage Plate, anyway

[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

They don't even understand the concept of the first amendment...

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like I'm not American but is one party really more corrupt there? Like wanting to kill minorities is not corruption, that's just normal evil shit. Don't both parties basically pilfer the economy, do massive amounts of insider trading and sell the US to corpos on a daily basis? That's at least the impression I have gotten. Like one party is absolutely more comically evil though.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeeaaaah, we ain't doin' so hot.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

One party does it far more than the other, but largely yes. The democratic party does have a progressive wing that wants to fix these things, but they don't have the power to do so yet. The Republicans don't.

load more comments
view more: next ›