Games

16697 readers

653 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Twitter: Nintendo is suing the creators of popular Switch emulator Yuzu (twitter.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Sebastrion@leminal.space to c/games@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Docket monitor: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/rhode-island/ridce/1:2024cv00082/56980

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Here we go again, hope Nintendo loses. But yuzu with that pateron access thing were kinda cringe.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They also painted a gigantic red target on their back with that.

The legal arguments against piracy are related to loss of potential income, but that's hard to prove.

Except when you accept donations and they can point to it directly. When the donations spiked around the time of the Tears of the Kingdom leak, Nintendo's lawyers probably got very excited.

I'm not saying the devs for emulators can't or should never accept donations, but you have got to be smarter about this.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Emulation is not piracy.

There is an abundance of precedent that emulation is not copyright infringement and is not in any way illegal. You can absolutely make money on an emulator and there is absolutely nothing they can do.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even if it's perfectly pristine and legal, it still paints a giant target on their backs. Even if someone is in the right, they need to spend way more on lawyers to prove it.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago

It's already proven. Repeatedly.

Nintendo and every lawyer involved should see obscene fines for the blatant harassment.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 months ago

https://github.com/yuzu-emu/yuzu

Might be wise to download a copy of the source code in case something happens.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sony v Bleem! And Nintendo v Galoob already set legal precedent in this case, no? They sue over alleged "circumventing copy protection," but doesn't Yuzu operate the same as Ryujinx? Why would Nintendo only go for Yuzu and not both?

[–] XCraftMC@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yuzu opened a patreon, therefore making profit on the project. When you start making profit is when Nintendo sends the homing missiles.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Bleed and galoob were both explicitly comercial products.

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Well shit. We all know how that's gonna play out.