this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
481 points (97.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
2981 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 116 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

All Capitalists Are Bastards.

American Cops are bullies, they might beat you to death, but a capitalist... They won't even leave a drop of blood after sucking your exploited husk dry.

Even fascists will remember who they kill as some monstrous victory of hatred in their fucked, genocidal heads, as the murder is the point, but capitalists are the opposite in temperament: cold, unfeeling reptiles. They'll knowingly poison a town of children if it means more profit, pay the paltry fine, and never bother learning the name of the town they poisoned, just an irrelevant speedbump to glorious profit.

It is just business after all. And it's bonkers what that phrase has successfully become an accepted excuse for, despite essentially having the same meaning as "just following orders."

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 56 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The cops are just the capitalist's boots on the ground.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Don't forget a major contributor to minority oppression, too. Police in Capitalistic society are multifaceted and multi-roled.

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Rule of acquisition #102: Nature decays, but latinum lasts forever.

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Just business" "Just following orders" "It is what it is" "What can you do?"

These all sound equivalent because they are. Their linguistic purpose represents a "thought terminating cliche".

We say these things when we don't want to spend any more time thinking about something, or don't want to think about it at all. It can be laziness or outright avoidance, but it often leads people marginalized or persecuted. For this reason anytime I hear a phrase like this come out of my mouth I try to pause & consider if I'm about to hurt someone that I could easily avoid hurting.

Edit: thought terminating cliches in and of themselves are not a bad thing. They also keep us from getting stuck in paradox loops like a machine. Sometimes things you don't have agency at all over are better just not to think about too hard to avoid bitterness. It's important though that it doesn't become a reflex and instead is utilized as a coping mechanism.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 87 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To save money, people should stop buying kelloggs shit.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I stopped eating breakfast most days. Don't need it. I rarely eat cereal when I do. And I used eat cereal so much when I was younger. Then I realized even the "healthy" cereal is not good for you. Just sugar disguised as something else.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

When the commercials say [brand] [product] is a part of this complete breakfast, it would still be a complete breakfast with the cereal removed.

[–] shadowSprite@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I've stopped eating breakfast, lunch, and most days dinner too! Gosh end stage capitalism is fun when for meals I just keep convincing my body that no, you aren't actually hungry as I drink more water.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can get unsweetened bran flakes, those are a great source of fiber and added vitamins. They suck, because they're unsweetened bran flakes, but healthy cereal does exist.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hope Grape Nuts are healthy because goddamn are they a chore to eat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 81 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Cereal is expensive. This is bad advice even without considering the conflict of interest or the fact this man is a tool.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Fuck Kellogg's but buying cereal in those bulk bags instead of in boxes literally makes cereal cost half as much. You pay out the ass for the privilege of a box.

In my experience, you save more buying cereal in bulk than most other foods, even ones more commonly bought in bulk.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They don't even sell them in bags in Canada

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

You guys have bagged milk but not bagged cereal?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he likes being a tool, tools repair things.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I love repairing things with my pickaxe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"What? Cereal only costs $20, right?"

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

"it's one cereal Michael"

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I don't mean to defend him at all (in fact, I do eat cereal, but it's local store brands and not Kellogg's), but isn't it normal for a person selling a product to tell people to buy its products?

At the same time, I agree it's terrible advice he's giving!!!

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 49 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'd suggest this guy get the yogurt enema that was so popular at Kellogg during its early days.

(You know what cures those deviant sexual urges? Having thick white liquid injected into your rectum.)

[–] Opafi@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

FYI: the German Wikipedia page suggests that he might have had klismaphilia. The English version, despite being much more detailed and extensive, doesn't, for some odd reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Assuming someone by necessity needed to do that, then a bowl of porridge would be better than cereal. It would be cheaper to buy, more filling & nutritious. And someone that cash strapped shouldn't be eating Kelloggs cereals at all since the generic equivalent probably costs half the price and tastes the same.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

A roommate of mine who was an Econ major told me once that the knockoff bag cereals are often made by the same company that makes the name brand. That they’re the exact same product.

He said this is because there isn’t really much crossover between the market segments. People don’t comparison shop the bag cereal, they buy it because it’s cheaper and they wouldn’t buy the box cereal otherwise. And people who buy box cereal don’t really buy bag cereal. There’s no competition between the segments.

So if Kellogg’s or Post or General Mills makes the same cereal and throws it in a bag under a different brand name with a random title, they make more money than they would if they left that segment of the market to another player.

This is the same reason Costco and Sam’s Club brands have products that compare well with the brand names…they’re the exact same product, sold under a cheaper brand. Brew Dr can sell their kombucha under their brand at one price, but ALSO make kombucha and sell it under the Kirkland brand, and they’ll make money on both products.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Exactly.

Another way to look at this is: It's not the store brand version that's marked down, it's the "name brand" version that's marked up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Gary Pilnick, you are a gigantic douche.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

We don’t want your Monsanto crispy cancer flakes anyway, Gary

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

It's a crime that many people have to fight to merely exist then this piece of shit decides to rub it in by suggesting those folks eat cereal for dinner, as though that's a realistic or fair solution to the problem, especially while full well knowing he's going home to a 5-star dinner likely cooked by a private chef.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When I stopped eating cereal for breakfast, I lost weight and improved my blood sugar levels. If you want diabetes, go ahead and eat cereal.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That largely depends on the cereal. In the UK there are popular cereal types which have very little sugar in them - oats, weetabix, shredded wheat, ready brek that are fine for diabetics. The worst offenders would be kids cereals & anything overtly sugary as well as things like granola, muesli etc. Things like cornflakes, shreddies, rice krispies sit somewhere at the low end - not healthy per se but fairly low in sugar

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're all, perhaps with the exception of raw steel-cut oats, or plain bran, pretty simple carbohydrates, and you add sugar in the form of lactose on top to eat them. Pretty sure none of them are a net positive to health.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They’re all, perhaps with the exception of raw steel-cut oats, or plain bran, pretty simple carbohydrates, and you add sugar in the form of lactose on top to eat them. Pretty sure none of them are a net positive to health.

The UK diabetes website says they're fine. I'm sure if you were diabetic you would be extra careful about milk, portion size though. For everyone else they're about as low sugar as cereal gets, whether we're talking breakfast cereal, or cereal in fields cereal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xor@infosec.pub 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Race Betterment Foundation was a eugenics and racial hygiene organization founded in 1914 at Battle Creek, Michigan by John Harvey Kellogg due to his concerns about what he perceived as "race degeneracy".

weird, considering how the founder of Kellogg's was such a great guy.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, John Harvey Kellogg is not the founder of Kellogg. His brother, Will Keith founded the cereal company. John Harvey owned a sanitarium and advocated all sorts of kooky things, mostly “health” related, as broadly as that term was considered at the time. IIRC Will Keith didn’t seem to share a lot of his brother’s beliefs but was more than happy to sell the cereals his brother promoted as beneficial to his adherents.

Of course, a wealthy industrialist supporting racist beliefs at the turn of the last century would be pretty common, but I don’t know specifically about W. K. Kellogg’s beliefs.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 8 months ago

West of Loathing lampoons Kellogg and it's pretty great.

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago

This is how social darwinist rich people or also known as rich see you.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 15 points 8 months ago

I certainly understand why a man who sells cereal would tell me to eat more cereal and what a good idea eating cereal would be.

Like when the U.S. asks NATO members to beef up their defense spending.

[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago

"Let them eat cake."

[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

I haven’t had cereal since i was a kid. Once I could make my own food choices, I haven’t touched the stuff.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

As he should.

load more comments
view more: next ›