Seems like kind of a waste of government time and resources.
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
101 points (95.5% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3743 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Seems like kind of a waste of government time and resources.
The best way to prove your point that the government is too big and too dysfunctional is to make it too big and too dysfunctional.
For most, this would reflect poorly at review time. For some, this would invite a dismissal for performance or team cohesion issues. These folks wouldn't know anything about any of that.
They saw a name with a silent J and voted with their (racist) gut instincts.
And the understatement of the year award goes to..
The guy that said “this is why we’re fucked.”
I'm mostly disappointed in the Biden speechwriters. Mayorkas Malarky would be excellent branding for this.
"Do something about the border!"
"Give us funding."
"No! Do something about the border."
"We can't without funding."
"We said no! DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE BORDER!"
"What would you have us do?"
"IMPEACHED!!!!!"
In the meantime texas physically bars them in some areas from doing their job.
What happens next is it goes to the Senate for a dog and pony show and dies.
How much do you want to bet that they never would have impeached if he was named "Alex Mayor" and was born here instead of Cuba?
I've been saying this from the start- they went after a non-white administration member first and that was a message.
Same thing that would have happened if this failed this vote, absolutely nothing. This is just the Republicans throwing a temper tantrum to drum up news coverage and to give the talking heads over on Faux News something to yammer on about for a while. Expect to see the headline "Crisis at the Border" used prominently by Faux for a while.
Fucking childish theatrics. He was impeached on no grounds.
this whole situation has all the tact and self reflection as a standard issue Texas driver in their lifted dually rolling coal through a crowded parade (less than zero).
Question: does impeachment mean anything, i mean they impeached trump twice i believe and still sat there till the end
It has effectively become a political stunt unless one party controls both wings of Congress, at which point it will become a way to remove anyone they dislike for any reason
Which is the point of this. They're running a twice impeached candidate.
Their purpose is to make impeachment a common, meaningless political stunt.
The house impeaches with a majority of votes for the members present at the time.
Next it has to pass the Senate trial. The Senate is 49 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and 3 independent. A couple Democrats also tend to side with Republicans. Since he has been impeached, a trial happens in the Senate and 2/3 majority has to agree to remove from office.
I'd assume unless someone fucked up really badly and both sides hate them it is very unlikely for a 2/3 majority.
Ah ok.
Impeachment is like being charged with a crime; removal is like being convicted. Trump was impeached, but not removed
It goes to the Senate for "trial" to vote on removing Mayorkas from office.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-controlled House voted Tuesday to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the Biden administration’s handling of the U.S.-Mexico border.
House Republicans have spent months investigating the secretary’s actions as they’ve aimed to make immigration and border security a key election issue.
The House Homeland Security Committee has been holding hearings over roughly the last year where Republicans have repeatedly lambasted Mayorkas.
Witnesses have included an Arizona sheriff, families who have lost loved ones to the fentanyl crisis, experts on constitutional law, and former Homeland Security officials who served under former President Donald Trump.
U.S. House Republicans say the secretary is violating immigration laws by not detaining enough migrants and by implementing a humanitarian parole program that they say bypasses Congress to allow people into the country who wouldn’t otherwise qualify to enter.
But the Biden administration and supporters contend that the secretary is dealing with a wildly underfunded and outdated immigration system that only Congress has the power to truly fix.
The original article contains 1,006 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!