this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
375 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3756 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) came in fifth place in a straw poll of voters in the district where the controversial congresswoman recently relocated and is trying to win reelection to the House.

Boebert, who was first elected to represent Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District in 2020, announced last month she would switch districts and instead run for reelection this year in the 4th District, after its House member, Rep. Ken Buck (R), decided to retire from Congress.

The new district for Boebert would likely give her a significantly better chance at reelection if she wins the Republican nomination. She currently represents a swing district, and Boebert had seemed likely before her switch to face off a second time against Democrat Adam Frisch, whom she defeated in 2022 by fewer than 600 votes.

The 4th District, meanwhile, is a solidly Republican district that has elected a Democratic House member only once in the past 50 years.

But the results of the straw poll Thursday, which followed the first debate among GOP candidates running for that district, indicates Boebert may have an uphill battle.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 91 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Here's hoping her eventual career with Brazzers pans out as well as her Congressional career.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know, I'd watch it, just for the humiliation factor of a fall that hard.

[–] A_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that would be more respectable than what she has been doing. It's just honest sex for money.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Very true, which probably means she can't do it, because it would require acknowledging sex work as work.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

Bobert's Explore Talent profile pictures made it seem plausible she was an escort at one point.

[–] jopepa@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

More likely phishing banner ads

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 70 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Boebert is ‘exhibit A’ that members of Congress should be required to pass a minimum standardized test of basic civics knowledge prior to candidacy.

Such a test would have undoubtedly prevented Boebert, Greene, Tuberville, and other flotsam/ jetsam non-serious “legislators” from their embarrassing placement.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

We don’t even have to make a new test. Just hold them to the same standard we hold new immigrants to.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (7 children)

https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/06/voting-rights-and-the-supreme-court-the-impossible-literacy-test-louisiana-used-to-give-black-voters.html

OP film yourself taking this test and post the results for us to grade. You have ten minutes, you need a perfect score to pass. This is a very real poll test given to people in Louisiana (at the discretion of poll workers, of course) to determine whether they were allowed to vote.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Sure— but your suggestion is red herringly tangential as it pertains to A CANDIDATE holding office in Congress.

I am not running for office.

Our representatives, however, should (at the bare minimum) understand how government works in my opinion— which was the basis of my post.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] peterpan520@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But it shouldn't take a test to prevent such candidates. You would think that voters would not vote for someone like that.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

It turns out too many voters are morons to reject even the most obviously unqualified, criminal, treasonous candidates.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Maybe we just need better citizen education.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As a resident of the district this asshat currently represents, I was disappointed that I wouldn't be able to to vote her out of office this year. Sounds like that won't be an issue for the 4th either. Womp fucking womp you piece of shit traitor.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

As a resident of her new district I will be profoundly relieved if my neighbors prove to be slightly less nutty than they appear. I’m sure I won’t be super-excited about whoever they come up with, but I would appreciate being spared this person. 😂

I won’t even fool myself that we could ever elect a democrat in CD4. We’ll be lucky to scrounge up a candidate at all.

[–] drmeanfeel@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know who the competition is but I hope it's not one of those "she's not crazy and racist enough" situations

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

Same here. It's depressing being surrounded by people that consistently vote against their best interests.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Now if only Marge could follow her...

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I saw Bobert finishes and I was like well "What new musical came to Colorado?".

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also....what about her date? Did they finish?

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

She only lets them finish in the back

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 31 points 9 months ago

I read the headline as "Boebart finishes fifth grade". My reaction was "That's nice, dear." in a very condescending manner.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh no. Now who will be in charge of heavy petting during congressional hearings

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

and the daily dick pick.

or was that the other howler monkey?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She needs to win over voters one HJ at a time

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

These guys figured out a more efficient method:

[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What if I did middle out?

My favorite part was they’re still discussing it and say Richard’s been in there for hours, meaning they’ve been occupied for hours optimizing. 😂

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, that's what makes it so relatable to real IT work.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m very much looking forward to not ever having to pay attention to her again.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

I was going to say like Sarah Palin but apparently she's still kicking around trying to fill vacant seats.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 9 months ago

Hope she finally fucking loses.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay, Riker is back... but which Riker?

[–] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

[actual footage from Colorado's 4th district]

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Well, Boebert is the Q candidate

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Fuck this one got me. Bravo.

[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The 3rd district in Colorado is not a swing district. It became a swing district because of Boebert. It was pretty red before she showed up.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Cool. Send her to Florida

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It became a swinger district because of Boebert

I think you meant this ^

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

We also redrew the districts fairly recently, which might have made it more competitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

looks like it's back to giving handjobs in public

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

she'll probably get a job on fox news or OAN

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Nothing a few handies can’t fix.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

HAHAHAHAHAAHHAAH

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I once thought Ken Buck was the worst.

load more comments
view more: next ›