this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
160 points (98.2% liked)

News

23177 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 104 points 8 months ago (2 children)

“Return to office!”

Why?

“Because otherwise these buildings we bought are worthless!”

Ok, hard pass.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 58 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"In that case, with our new-found leverage, we'd like to formally request a 40% pay increase and a 4-day work week to compensate for the inconvenience of propping up your failed real estate ventures. We look forward to your affirmative response."

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That'd be a lot easier with some sort of collective group that could make such a deal.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

You want to bargain collectively? Presenting a united front? What would you even call such a thing?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 20 points 8 months ago

Somehow, when people talk about "the government overregulating things", they never mean the insane amount of regulation in place in the US to prevent effective collective labour action.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe don't return to office and then they can sell the building and recover some lost equity?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My current employer did just that -- sold the space, sold the desks, and then enshrined remote work in the union contract.

Since they weren't tied to an office, people could work from anywhere the privacy and security regs allowed. That's the entire country. Turn-over is incredibly slow, but we can now pull from a national talent pool for a 100%WFH job. Competition is gonna heat up.

[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Lucky they found a buyer

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your Piped link doesn't work (as per usual with Piped).

Regardless I'm not watching it. Maybe you'd like to just make your point?

I'm advocating for not returning to office and questioning the logic in the comment I replied to, which I assume Shapiro is not.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's a very funny video with a clip of Ben Shapiro saying that the coast going underwater doesn't matter because people can just sell up and move. And hbomberguy asks who he thinks they're going to sell to, Aquaman?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Haha that's a good one.

Nah, there will be buyers for commercial buildings for the right price. Not pretending like they're going to get all of their investment back but as I said, you can still get some of it back.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For the right price, yeah. You'll be able to sell coastal properties for the right price too. Just nowhere near as much as you paid for them. They're not interested in getting only some of it back.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can reuse commercial buildings for other things (like residential sky rise). You cannot reuse underwater homes.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

Already covered.

I have no idea why people are trying to pretend it's not worrying the owners of these buildings when the owners of these buildings are throwing hissy fits all over the shop.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who's going to pay $1 for an underwater home? No, these things are not alike.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I said "dangerously close". Office buildings which are empty because they're not needed as offices any more can be sold to developers who will turn them into housing or shops. But with fewer employers based there, demand for housing and shops may also disappear.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or they can just be sold to other employers who actually need them?

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where are those employers coming from? The issue arises precisely because companies don't need anything like as much office space as they used to.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Some employers do, some don't. Maybe new businesses come along that need office space but couldn't previously afford it.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, obviously. Is the number of employers who no longer need the office space larger or smaller than the number of employers who need more office space?

They're going to make a loss. They do not want to make a loss. No amount of imaginary buyers is going to stop them having to take a loss.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I know, I stated that in my original comment.

[–] sirnuke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Commercial real estate loans are interest only? I had never heard of that before, but it makes sense with the buried lede:

borrowers prefer handing the property keys over to creditors over putting good money after bad

Which is what happens whenever a company has an asset they don't own and no longer want. Shrug and handover the keys. Seems to me like the lenders are going to be the ones taking the haircut, despite what the article asserts.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The lenders are the banks...sounds like an '08 again.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yep and it will end in massive public giveaway in free loan money to retrofit buildings to something useful, like residential(yes I know of the challenges but there is no better option). Even progressive cities are fucked because their downtown cores that they sold gladly sold out or allowed to be developed out from under their constituents have almost all their tax dollars coming from CRE so they are levered to pro up CRE.

[–] comador@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is at least one other option: Vertical Farming. I saw one of these in San Francisco go up, but there's quite a few cities trying it out:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/empty-office-buildings-are-being-turned-into-vertical-farms-180982502/

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell everyone who has tried this has failed. The energy for the grow lights is too expensive.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Also it would require changing commercial buildings to industrial. I'm not an expert on this but soil weighs a lot so unless these are plant nurseries I would expect its a more expensive transition than than residential as we're talking adding like forklift elevators and drains to everything.

[–] pearable@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I hope they'll do retrofits. I wonder what that would do to the housing market. If it actually made housing affordable a huge chunk of investors and home owners would be royally pissed. Great way to decrease homelessness, and I might be able to afford a house, but I doubt they'll do it for that and previous reasons.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The other sad part is it answers many problems on traffic and congestion by doing what most countries do to enable density; build up not out with incredible efficiency gains. There are many social benefits as well and in a society that struggles with depression and loneliness as much as America, hard to think of a solution that solves as many problems as taking empty buildings and adding affordable housing.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

They're called balloon loans. They're pretty common for mortgages anywhere outside the US. Instead of paying principal plus interest each period, you only pay the interest. At the end of the term, you pay the principal itself.

They also can't just hand the keys back unless it's in the original contract or the bank agrees. If a lot of companies are choosing to ditch their properties, the banks will choose to refuse this option.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Time to stop eating all that avocado toast!