with much of the funding going toward repairing and building new bridges.
New bridges are woke. Stop new bridges from grooming our children!
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
226 points (97.9% liked)
politics
18898 readers
3026 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That's it, I'm boycotting bridges.
If Biden is so woke, why is his nickname Sleepy Joe‽‽ Hard to be woke while sleeping!!!!1!!eleven!!!
Im just gonna pull out an old conversation from highschool that kinda fits this.
"The hell is that?" -Me
"A suspension bridge?" -Friend
"No, thats a penis nbridge." -Me
"Their building penis bridges to turn the freaking kids gay!" -Other friend across the room
"See, I aint the only one."
For quick context he was playing cities skylines on his laptop and was messing with the terrain tool. The reason he was doing that is cause the power was knocked out by lighting, so we were all waiting for pickup.
Typical libs, spending tax money on woke infrastructure and satanic public improvements. Trump was going to have an even better infrastructure unveiling unlike anything anyone had ever seen, but the libs had to ruin it with all their voting and subsequent transition of power.
It was just two weeks away, the biggest and best infrastructure project in the history of ever, believe me.
I'm with you. I would much rather have satanic infrastructure and woke public improvements. I also propose we start calling polling places "Gay Polling Locations," too.
Is it infrastructure week already?
I am all for Infrastructure.
Though $600 million for that I-5 bridge over the Columbia River seems very low. The Narrows Bridge across the Puget Sound cost like $800 million in 2007 and I feel like that was a smaller project. I am sure there's some sort of cost matching with WA and OR funding involved but that in particular caught my eye having personal context to that bridge.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Washington — President Biden is set to unveil a nearly $5 billion investment into dozens of infrastructure projects throughout the country on Thursday during a visit to Superior, Wisconsin.
The investment targets 37 major infrastructure projects throughout the country across at least 12 states, with much of the funding going toward repairing and building new bridges.
White House principal deputy press secretary Olivia Dalton called this a "full-circle moment" for the president.
"He first visited the Blatnik Bridge about two years ago after the State of the Union in 2022 to talk about the important investments we're making through the bipartisan infrastructure law in America," Dalton said aboard Air Force One.
During the visit, the president is set to meet with small business owners who the White House says are expected to benefit from the new Blatnik Bridge.
"Joe Biden bet on the American worker while Donald Trump blamed the American worker," UAW President Shawn Fain said in his announcement during the UAW's political convention in Washington, D.C. "We need to know who's gonna sit in the most powerful seat in the world and help us win as a united working class.
The original article contains 411 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I thought they did this 3 years ago?
Which part? I was thinking exactly the same for the Sagamore Bridge and had to look it up. Apparently the rotary was 2004 and the facelift was like 2013. It’s just that replacing the bridge has been talked about forever. Usually someone tries to say it’s an intentional bottleneck to reduce traffic on the Cape. What morons.
It takes courage to visit Superior, WI in January.
It's not that cold today. Not that dangerous except normal Wisconsin danger
Normal Wisconsin danger... 👀
These projects should come with strict minimum wage requirements and maximum profit margins for the corporations that run them.
If you pay young people 40 bucks an hour to work on bridges, they will come flocking for these good jobs and regard the fed positively for life.
But they're being institututed by dems so they'll pay 17 an hour, work nights, and give the CEO leeway to pocket 15 million bucks a year.
You may be right, but let's not cast aspersions without reason. No sense creating a villain where one doesn't (yet) exist.
It's okay to celebrate the win and also remain vigilant.
You're severely underestimating how much engineers and construction workers make.