this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
763 points (86.6% liked)

Political Memes

5232 readers
1936 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
763
Critique (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don't, you weren't paying attention.

Plenty of us were critiquing Clinton's campaign on those merits and were consistently talked down to in shocker the same way we're being talked down to now. Shocker, she lost. I remember saying a few weeks before the election "We're about to get Brexited." I put my vote down for Clinton, because Trump is fucking insane, and that was clear before he was President. It was clear in the fucking 1980's.

Being able to critique our leaders is supposed to be what is the difference between us and conservative voters. They're the cult who unquestioningly believes all the bullshit that comes out of Trump's mouth and diapers. I find it weird that people think we should be more like them in regards to our leaders like that would be a good thing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 107 points 8 months ago (8 children)

The fact that one can win the popular vote and still lose is a yuuuuge part of what’s wrong with our fucked up voting system.

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 66 points 8 months ago (3 children)

One single current supreme court justice was appointed by a republican president who won the popular vote.

There's six of them.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's an astounding fact that speaks to the much deeper problem.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

The SCOTUS, the Senate, and the Electoral College are all relics of a government designed by and fore landed gentry that explicitly did not want a popular government in control.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Popular vote should just be the vote.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately it's just too popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

We're always one Brooks Brothers Riot away from the election being hijacked by a handful of well-placed political operatives.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I know this isn’t necessarily the point of the post, but I’m going to use this as an opportunity to bring it up anyway—

I can’t help but fear that the 2024 election is going to be an example of the DNC “reaping what they sowed.” In 2020 it felt like the DNC did whatever they could to push Biden through as a candidate despite more youthful, progressive options (and Bernie, who wasn’t youthful, but was progressive and in line with what a lot of the US left wanted). In many wants it felt like they did this because Biden was:

  1. More moderate in willing to bend to the political interests of lobbyists
  2. An easier option to beat Trump

In some ways I understand why it happened, but I was terrified of the situation we currently are in back then. Fast forward four years and now we’re left with a very elderly Biden versus an even more extreme Trump; and now it’s not a sure shot that Biden is going to win. Instead of uniting as a party and building up a new candidate who truly represented the people’s interests in 2020 the DNC decided to kick the can. As a result of that can kicking we may be facing the end of American democracy as we know it in 2024. It’s sickening to me.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 7 months ago

No, that's definitely part of the point!!! Excellent addition, thank you.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

building up a new candidate who truly represented the people’s interests

You realize the DNC has no interest whatsoever in this, right? Like the Wasserman/Clinton fix was exactly this not happening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's a good point but there is plenty of blame to go around. The democrats have part of the responsibility, but the lions share sits with the republicans.

The democrats are also at fault for elevating Clinton. She was a poor candidate who was backed by the political establishment. The notion it was "her turn" had already played out with Obama and she lost handily. There were better candidates in the primaries.

The same problem is happening with Biden. He is a bad candidate but he is being waved through by the party out of a paralysing fear of trump.

But they're all symptoms of the extremely broken US electoral system with first past the post, gerrymandering, electoral colleges and politically appointed and elected officials including judges all entrenching the absolute power of 2 parties.

In my opinion the solution would be at the grass roots with local plebiscites on proportional representation in elections to local and state government, and other positions. That would bring more meaningful change than most of the other propositions that get put on the ballots as it'd allow a route for political opposition to organise into new parties, capture funding and power and gradually build a base to fight and win other elections.

Unfortunately the 2 main parties have convinced the electorate that the status quo is vital. For example California is a "democrat state" and anything that undermines that is dangerous because the enemy might get in. It's all bullshit. The rules are being set by the incumbents but actually the whole game needs to change.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago

The real problem is the cap on the size of the house of representatives. If we doubled the size, California would get about 60 more representatives and votes, while states like Wyoming might get one more vote. It would also reduce the cost of campaigning per candidate, because donors aren't just going to give significantly more money just because more people are running.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Critiquing Biden is not an endorsement of trump

Damn if lemmy.world could read, I'd put that on a shirt 🥲

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (20 children)

I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don’t, you weren’t paying attention.

Barack Obama had the opportunity to become the next FDR. Instead, we got a modern day Woodrow Wilson, more interested in shoring up domestic businesses and building out international military alliances than repairing the post-'08 damage to the housing economy or extending full public health benefits to a nation crippled by medical bankruptcies.

By the time he left office, he was running on... what? A Pacific Rim trade deal we didn't need. A climate change crisis he'd failed to address. A slew of new military conflicts in the Middle East introduced under his administration that he'd originally promised to end. A federal court system he'd allowed his Senate rivals to hijack.

Hillary sucked. But far too little credit is afforded to the guy who had eight years to deliver on desperately needed federal reforms and - either through incompetence or unwillingness - failed to do so.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 months ago (16 children)

"Abortion is not my highest legislative priority." -Obama 2009

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I don't have a problem with people critiquing Democrats, I have a problem with them arguing that voting for democrats is bad.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, Letting the far right get voted in does not push the Democrats to the left, if anything it pulls them right. Fight like hell but protest abstaining does not achieve anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

This is my sticking point as well. I'm down for any and all critique of the Democrats, but when the general election comes around the absolute #1 priority has to be preventing and removing conservatives from power. Not a single good policy comes from conservatives. They exist purely to block progressive policies. Let's get rid of them and see what we can accomplish.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If we keep trump out but do nothing else, we've only delayed a fascistic movement reaching the white house, not defeated it.

Biden needs to put forward actual policies that address the conditions that are fostering the violent fascistic rhetoric, not just so that he can win in November but so that we aren't dealing with a growing nationalism problem for the next cycle.

The people who are criticizing Biden now desperately want him to succeed by these measures, but don't believe he's yet done enough. Maybe if we were having this debate a month out from election day, then we should be panicked about the electoral calculus; but he has ample (or at least some) time to address the concerns being raised here. In a non-incumbent cycle, a primary would help refine the policy agenda for the general. So far all we've gotten is "we have to keep trump out".

That is not a winning agenda (no matter how true it is). It didn't work in 2016, and it likely won't work now. Biden needs something tangible to campaign on, and right now it's not clear that he has one.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They plan on doing the same thing they did in 2016. Beat voters over the head with "how great of a job we're doing" while ignoring voters real concerns, talking down to them, and generally leaning on "if you don't vote for us, you'll end up with a fascist who wants to kill you." Which in itself certainly feels like a threat. "We can skip the country to escape, you can't, better vote for us!" It's downright abusive and it has an unfortunately good chance at catching up with them this election and the only people who will pay are the US citizens.

Still voting for Biden anway. Don't really have a choice if I don't want fascism. Just don't like being bullied into it by the people I'm voting for while they smugly ignore my legitimate concerns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

Tribal thinking is a sign of lack of maturity. If you don't think being, "better than TFG." is a pathetic excuse for a party platform, you're either a child or utterly incompetent at governing, or both.

Similarly, if anyone assumes someone attacking Democrats, a center-right party, MUST be coming from the right ... they're painfully ignorant of politics in general.

Too bad this country is full of immature children that managed to reach adult age... Regardless of how bad the Dems are, they're still the only valid choice for someone making moral decisions. No, Biden is anything but perfect, but literally no one else can win that isn't outright evil ... partly because Democrats run a pathetic party and don't actually fight for democracy.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That's what makes it so downright abusive for them to dangle fascism over our heads like a threat if we don't get behind their milquetoast bullshit half-ass glad-handing fascists fuckery. They know we don't have a choice so they don't even fucking try.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

The job of a US politician seems to be convincing their donors and constituents that they will protect each from the other.

Campaigning on policy that benefits the voters goes against the class interests of the donors, but campaigning on "the other guy is bad" keeps the donors happy.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 25 points 7 months ago

Yes!

Next up; How I spilled my Pepsi and why I blame coke.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 22 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Voters =/= DNC though

We got Trump because Clinton was largely uninspiring. She made herself this bland neolib that nobody actually wanted to vote for and then mocked Trump as a non threat.

Everything you said is true but I personally think the real reason it happened was because Clinton was a bad pitch and she would've lost to most Republicans at the time.

They should've gone with Bernie just that simple

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 19 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Okay. Blame them all you want, just don't stay home on Election Day. VOTE against Donald Trump as he's the more immediate problem, then we demand voting reform...

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Moderation around here is not prepared for this trash to seriously pick up this year.

Can't wait to hear my daily "reminders" about how everything is actually the DNC's fault for not resurrecting Bernie's campaign for a third time because he'd totally win this time.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 months ago

The DNC purposely drew the press's attention to Trump in the primaries to intentionally move the Republican party further right. They thought the far-right candidates would be easier to beat: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

Democratic groups and candidates purposely took out ads promoting pro-Trump candidates in 2022. This is a very dangerous strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago

Hubris was a factor, but it pales in comparison to the furor of the conservative voter base after 8 years of that brown feller.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (6 children)

The dnc should have let Bernie Sanders become the nominatee like the voters wanted, instead of rigging the primary for Hillary.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The worst part for me is I literally see the hubris playing out again with Joe Biden’s stance of only running because he is the only one who can beat Trump. Polling keeps showing he is literally the only possible candidate on Dem side that could lose against him. It seems most Dems are either hoping Trump won’t win and those who think he will are shouting any and every other name including the former first lady Michelle Obama, over Biden or even his VP Harris. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/19/us/politics/trump-biden-voters-2024-election.html https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/biden-trump-both-underperform-generic-opponents-poll-finds-rcna126098 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-national-lead-grows-opinion-poll-republican-primary/

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

This whole "we have to beat Trump at the ballot box" shit also shows how truly toothless the Democrats are. This guy started a fucking insurrection and they're letting him run for President. They waited two years until he started selling nuclear secrets to start any criminal proceedings against him. I've said plenty of times our reluctance to punish Bush for war crimes is a direct line to Trump. They weren't willing to stand up for war crimes, and they won't stand up for this.

They literally are signaling loud and clear that if Trump wins again, even illegitimately, they will not be the defenders of democracy and they will step aside and let Trump be a dictator.

Hell, they'll probably pull a Ray Nagin and run off to Europe to cry on CNN Europe about how sad they are for all of us still stuck here under Trump's authoritarian thumb.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Waiting 2 years was political. Nothing more. They're to blame again if Trump gets in. I'm so tired of their stupid milquetoast candidates.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

In this thread:

People reminding the rest of us how much they don't remember shit. Also in this thread: See how propaganda works! More at 11.

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (6 children)

didn't she also illegally sabotage Bernie?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I mean, Trump won prettily handily against the other Rupublican's is my recollection. I can agree that Clinton and her campaign wanted to face him, and helped, but I think it still would have been Clinton vs Trump regardless. I think blaming Democrats for Trump is similar to blaming Trump for Covid: Yeah he made the US response worse, leading to unnecessary deaths, but Covid was still going to affect the nation and people were going to die regardless.

I mean there's an increasingly muddied line between critiquing the potential president, and supporting their opponent. Russia is almost certainly trying to push the latter here in Lemmy and everywhere else. It worked amazingly well in 2016 and they're hoping they can repeat that for this election. With so much of that propaganda they're pushing, people do get defensive about critiquing Biden. Sometimes rightfully so ("Biden is supporting genocide in Gaza, we need to vote 3rd party or Republican so the Democrats can change") other times its not warranted ("Biden needs to fix his response to Israel to not turn off voters to him").

Critique all you like. You're allowed too. But I feel a lot of people draw the line at encouraging voting 3rd party, not voting or voting for Trump for this election. There may be a D candidate that's more favorable than Biden, but statistically, the incumbent has better odds at winning reelection than losing. I'd much rather ensure that Trump doesn't get reelected, rather hoping a new candidate is not only better than Biden, but also able to beat Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Critiquing Democrats is not an endorsement of Republicans

OK.
Just be aware that doing so publicly, especially around election time, increases the probability of Republicans getting elected. So ask yourself if its the right time and place - regardless of what your intentions are, what sort of effects will your actions actually cause in the world?

IMO, the best time and place to make your opinion on Democratic policy known is the Democratic primary election and who you choose to help campaign for the primaries.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

IMO, the best time and place to make your opinion on Democratic policy known is the Democratic primary election and who you choose to help campaign for the primaries

No, because Superdelegates. It’s not a real vote if the party apparatus can force the result they want by blunting a challenger’s momentum/stopping their win.

Besides, airing complaints at the primary only gets them heard by the hyper-engaged of the electorate. I.e. not your typical voter. “Go vote in the primary” is the correct messages, yes. But you’ll never be heard by a bigger crowd who might agree and also agitate for change(s).

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago (6 children)

As I pointed out to someone else: So valid critiques of the Democrats are what depress and demotivate voters, not... *checks notes... the things that the Democrats failed at themselves? No, it only rises to upsetting people when people talk about it. Do you realize that's what you're arguing here, that Democratic failures don't demotivate people, only people talking about them.

I'm sorry but I'm pretty sure the failures are demotivating on their own, and folks like me are demotivated by being told we're not allowed to talk about them.

Also, we have elections every two years. My entire life, I've been told it's "too close to an election to for that kind of critique."

As I asked others (with no good answers) when are we going to be allowed to critique them, then? Because I'm pushing fifty and I've dealt with this bullshit "you can't critique them NOW" for over twenty fucking years of voting.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

During the democratic primary? So.. like, right freaking now?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How many decades now have democrats been 3 steps less right than Republicans running on nothing but "We're not Republicans?"

They've had plenty of time to get it together but instead they slither further and further right to sate "centrists" (that were never going to vote dem anyway.) Meanwhile, everybody shrieks that dems are the only line between us and fascism as they fascism all over their voters at the dnc and Biden sidesteps congress to fund genocide.

Sounds fascist to me. 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›