this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
396 points (98.1% liked)

World News

32287 readers
689 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Every weapon sent to Ukraine is a weapon not dropped on Palestinians

The west should exhaust its ammunitions somewhere else other than the Middle East

I’m ashamed that my government hasn’t cut oil production. We are overdue for another oil embargo

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And they are correct. I really wish Congress would get their shit together.

[–] Truck_kun@beehaw.org 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's obvious, and either many congressmen are an agent of a foreign power, or are truly dumb enough to not realize the unspoken obviousness of this simple fact.

Prefix: I ended up ranting/venting a bit... our government is so frustrating at times:

From a US perspective, it is more a time for other countries to step up in this regard (as they have been), as while continued funding and support from the US will happen, it may be a long time from the US (maybe even 2 to 4 years if this election cycle doesn't oust/block some of these nutjobs that are either beholden to outside powers, or don't understand anything outside our own borders).

I'll take this time to say what many keep unspoken, because Ukrainians have the balls to actually voice it to the world:

No offense to Ukrainians, I want them to win, but even a loss in Ukraine after a sustained long drawn out battle, is of benefit to any country Russia considers an adversary, a place to oppress, or a country were attractive resources. Ukraine should be supported in their opposition to this invasion for as many years as it takes, no matter what. Twenty years, fifty years, however long; there should be no metric of 'it's been 2 years, and Ukraine hasn't won; are they just wasting our money?'. That is just a dumb concept.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

*Narrator voice*
They didn't finish the job

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Russia is resorting conscripting seniors and prisoners and putting them in 50 year old tanks with faulty ammo but do go on 😅

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We've been reading this shit for two years. At this point we're coping as much propaganda as the Russians are.

Even with 500.000 Russian soldiers dead, their population is 143 million people. I'm quite sure that they still have some spare Blyats lying around.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

not even if they were facing complete destruction would they conscript even 1% of the population.

Wars end when people get pissed or you run out of money. We are getting closer to that every day for both sides. if ukraine can at least keep getting more money, they eventually win. Ukrainians are the defenders, so their population is willing to fight for longer

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't look up the amount of Russian casualties in WW2.

Ukranians are getting forced into military draft too. I'm quite sure a large part of the Ukranians aren't willing to risk their lives for their country either. But you seem to have no problem sacrificing them as if they are funny peons you can throw at Russians.

Wonder how much you would support this if you were the one that was forced to go to the front line. You can volunteer to go to Ukraine and fight against the Russians yourself by the way.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Exactly, when Russia was being invaded, they lost a ton of people to defend their land. Doesn't mean they died willingly (people were drafted against their will, in every war in history that happens), but the pressure to surrender didn't mount up on the government. In a defensive war, people are more willing to die and to let their fellow citizens die. There are always people clamoring for an agreement or a surrender to avoid loss of life, but those voices are few compared to the ones who want to defend their land (or want others to go do it).

In a war of aggression however, every death come with a "why the fuck are we attacking them anyway? why did my son/brother/cousin have to die?". USA lost in vietnam that way. More kills, more money, won basically every engagement and still lost the war. If the population is against a war of aggression, it will end.

Very few wars end in complete domination of the enemy. Most end in an agreement of some sort or a retreat. I believe that, if Ukraine keeps getting money to stay in the fight, they will outlast Russia in political willingness to fight and will recover their land.