this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
323 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Comment from a ublock developer on this:

There is a lot of chatter in the last days about how Youtube is slow with content blockers. Those performance issues affect only the latest version of both Adblock Plus (3.22) & AdBlock (5.17), and afflict more than just Youtube. uBO is not affected.

https://twitter.com/gorhill/status/1746263759495077919

[–] generic@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 points 10 months ago

I didn't realize people still used AdBlock Plus, or that it even still existed.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

So it's not YouTube doing it?

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They were outright blocking it not long ago, so if they could still figure out who is doing it they’d probably just block them entirely again, right?

[–] Yeldarb12@toast.ooo 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think they saw it was kinda backfiring. If they make it inconvenient enough instead of impossible, people might give up? Or they are just trying to be dicks to people using ad blockers?

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But that does nothing unless they tell us they’re doing that.

If I just see the service getting slow, I’m not going to “Oh this is because of my adblocker, better turn it off to go fast” I’m going to think “Fuck YT is turning to shit, it cant even load a page. I’ll go watch Twitch or something”

[–] Yeldarb12@toast.ooo 2 points 10 months ago

I agree with you but not everyone has the same thought process as us. I've explained it to my entire family and I always end up "fixing it". My family doesn't care about alternatives because they dont like things to change. "Why learn something new when the old way still works?" My family's thought process on these things just doesn't make sense to me sometimes but it's the conclusion they get to.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

I think YouTube could stop adblockers and ytdlp easy if they actually wanted it

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since they failed to kill yt-dl, and in the meantime people have built plenty of very easy to use solutions to completely bypass YouTube's page, they may have finally realized that a nag screen with "subscribe for HD streaming" might be more effective than pushing even more people away.

[–] TheBaldness@beehaw.org 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm using Firefox w uBlock turned off for YouTube. It's almost unusable for me. They're not just degrading the experience of ad-blocking users. They're also sabotaging users of non-Chrome web browsers.

[–] YuzuDrink@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have a 2Gbps internet connection, and at my desktop running Firefox, I can’t reliably stream anything fancier than 1080p60. In the next room on my TV with an AndroidTV box attached, 4K60 streams flawlessly.

I never see ads because I pay for Premium, yet they still fuck me over.

[–] TheBaldness@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

I know, it's bad. I posted about it here: https://beehaw.org/post/10393316

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Luckily I just use Freetube and yt-dlp 🤷

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] thequickben@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can’t seem to get yt-dlp to download audio with video.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

🤔 I just use yt-dlp $youtubeLink e.g yt-dlp 'https://youtu.be/fG8SwAFQFuU' and it downloads both.

What are you entering?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not an expert, but would our net neutrality rules that the supreme jerk Ajit Pai helped revoke have been a tool to combat this behavior?

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

No.

Net neutrality refers to prioritizing/throttling traffic between the provider and the client based on anything other than infrastructure limitations and QoS markings, to avoid a situation where client network providers could conspire with service providers to extort extra payments from clients.

It says nothing about the provider deciding to throttle, or even completely block/ban, certain clients. That would be separate legislation, like the proposals to prevent "de-platforming" by major social networks (see how Threads avoided giving access to people in the EU until they enabled some integration with the Fediverse, to avoid getting accused of abuse of power).

[–] butter@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree?

They're going to try what they're going to try. This won't sway me, but it might sway someone. In which case, that user is subsidizing me

[–] peter@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

This one turned out to be the adblockers fault not YouTube. I think YouTube could end adblockers on their site in a day if they wanted to. I think their whole thing with the popups is more about adding FUD than actually blocking their use