this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
369 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 121 points 8 months ago

"If we can't get money from targeted far-right fake news anymore, we are going to pretend an achievement of basic social equality from a century ago is now a controversial opinion too"

Meta, probably.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 90 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] RockHornet@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, 4chan banned them because they were annoying.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Bullshit. Most of the people on 4chan are annoying. I think that they were afraid that QAnon would bring them the kind of trouble that they couldn't handle.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Rightfully.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

4 Chan should ban itself if that were the case

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s a fascist site. What did anyone expect?

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

I dunno. I kind of expected a FAANG company to hide it slightly better

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I can't believe people are dumb enough to still use Facebook.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

It's not being "dumb enough", it's an addiction in the sense that scrolling through, liking posts and posting things gives people a Dopamine high. It's really no different than a gambling or shopping addiction.

The site was designed that way. It took hints from the instant gratification that people got from grinding in World of Warcraft and the feeling of being important that MySpace gave everyone. Facebook is nothing but a virtual Skinner Box at this point.

[–] Bathtubwalrus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I have a dog rescue and it's where a lot of our adopters find us. More so than Petfinder, our site, or other social media. I also know a bunch of small businesses that use it too. Definitely still has a lot of practical use.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I only have it for groups, the only place on Facebook where meaningful interaction is still possible

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The sensitive social issue of Women's Suffrage?!? This is a historical and settled matter. What, are they going to ban games based on WW2 too?

There are far more controversial things that they let pass. No, this feels like active political interference, maybe some sort of internal anti-feminist bias.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 22 points 8 months ago

What?! A sensitive social issue was attempting to have society socialize about it on a social network?! Preposterous!

I jest, but it is interesting that fb wouldn't allow these specific ads, when it (fb) allows so many mis- and dis- information ads. But I'm just a Lemming. What do I know?

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But you can sell your horse sized dildos and anal hooks on their marketplace with no issues. Logic 100%

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That's the point?

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Won't argue for or against that but if they were, I'd expect them to be in a restricted area where people would look for them instead of being shown along with shoes, circular saws and xboxes

[–] kelseybcool@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You make it sound like all of these items are mutually exclusive...

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago