this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
324 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 95 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So, who is providing the software? Because that's who is paying to get a unique data set of face images. Specifically Brazilian faces of people who either self-indentify as hung over or want to try to game the system for a discount. I'll let you guess which population is going to be bigger.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Taking advantage of inebriated people to hand over their biometrics, not even for a free burger, but a discounted burger.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Formerly inebriated people.

A free burger would make for a very expensive data set methinks.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Oh no, they'd get slightly less obscenely wealthy on the exploitation of ill-gotten biometrics *shockedpikachuface*

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Feels like their training AI with live data until it gets good at detecting drunk people. Law enforcement and private security will love it. Precrime detectors in Training.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

But they're not using drunk people, they're using hung over people. Not sure why, it's an interesting question.

[–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe it's just burger king, so they can look at your selfies on Instagram and know when to fill your ad space with burgers 😜🍔

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 85 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Capitalist dystopia in its essence. Fetish for AI and normalization of mass surveillance, after all, AI's need to be fed, right?

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

What? Their fries are so good tho.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So they are actively encouraging alcoholism?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you take a real close look at alcohol culture you might notice hock shockingly widesperead, ancient and insane it all is

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When I was my kids age, it's what was fun. Now, it's been mostly replaced by gaming with friends.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a tiny microcosm of alcohol culture. Would you like to comment on the right way to drink scotch, or what characteristics make a bottle of fermented grape juice worth $10,000? Maybe have some blood of your savior?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's not real scotch unless it has a square foot of peat served next to it.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Brains love creating new neural pathways.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

It's not alcoholism to be hung over lol

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its brazil dude they have cocaine broblems

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

If your dudes are giving you broblems, then im afraid it is time for a change

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

I don't understand the how this positively indicates a dystopia.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

Legitimately thought this was from the Onion

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] geogle@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How do you know which language they are writing in?

[–] geogle@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Based on syntax, use of indents for code blocking, and the comment hash, I'd say it's meant to be python but has a bug. But it could always just be pseudo code with a mistake. But it doesn't look like any single = conditional language I know.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It looks like pseudo code to me. But pseudo code doesn't really have a standard, does it? So their personal flavor is perfectly acceptable and correct (single equals acting as comparison). We know what they mean, what they're trying to convey -- we get the joke. No need to pick it apart. 👍

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True, I wasn't intending to be nasty. I was more responding to the "How do you know" in a general sense of how one COULD assign it a language. No harm meant at all.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Oh, gosh, it's my mistake. I confused you with the person who made the initial nit-pick about the equal sign. Hey, have a good day! 😊

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Its a trap!

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now everyone's gonna be going around looking like shit for some extra pocket money.

[–] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some of us always look like shit.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

And now I get to accuse you of doing it on purpose!

Really though, being ugly is such a real disadvantage. You may as well have some financial burden lifted for it.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every day I thank the universe I learned how to cook for myself

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Two things have saved me money in this life - being able to cook, and being able to fix things.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Wait, I'm not browsing NotTheOnion??

[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Welcome to the world of tomorrow

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why would anybody would Burger King in any state of being?

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

drunk too am i

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

At least 7 you for one is happenstance

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Brazilian wing of Burger King announced a surveillance technology marketing stunt this week called the “Hangover Whopper,” celebrating the booze-filled days between Christmas and New Year’s with facial recognition.

“At the end of the year, it’s Friday every day, and the hangover kicks in,” a vaguely robotic voice says as images of cheeseburgers glitch in and out over fake computer code.

The Burger King software thought for a second, and then recommended the Double Whopper Jr. That’s only a one on the hangover scale — tell that to my headache — but I did earn a little discount for my privacy sacrifice: a coupon code for R$3.00, or about $0.62 in American dollars.

For the last decade, advocates raised alarms over the creeping spread of facial recognition, a technology that promises to destroy the few remaining shreds of privacy we have left.

Just last week, the FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial recognition for five years after an investigation found the drugstore used a lazy implementation of the technology to falsely accuse thousands of people of shoplifting, including one incident involving an 11-year-old girl.

It’s also functionally useless for other things like measuring your emotions, detecting political affiliations, or finding you a date, despite the dozens of companies promising digital phrenology.


The original article contains 591 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Joke's on them. I stop going in to not have my face scanned and then just starve.

[–] sugarfree@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago