this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
71 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3449 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OceanGate's cofounder wants to send 1,000 people to a floating colony on Venus by 2050, and says we shouldn't stop pushing the limits of innovation::Guillermo Söhnleinm told Insider he has wanted to make humanity a multi-planet species since he was 11 years old, and that OceanGate was part of that ambition.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranessin@feddit.de 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope the tickets are really expensive! And why wait until 2050?

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah. I mean for a couple million I have can build a rocker that is guaranteed to send billionaires to Venus. Just sign that waiver first please.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

let's offer musk first dibs for 20 billion dollars.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1000 billionaires, sounds like a great plan. They did so well last time.

Getting the flotation is actually not that difficult in terms of engineering since Venus has a crazy thick atmosphere. Not hard to float a balloon at an altitude of a few Earth atmospheres. Problem is your life is dependent on the reliability of the floatation system. It would take a lot of attention to fail safe design. That OceanGate organization would be like "the wrong stuff".

There's other engineering challenges in colonizing Venus such as solar radiation. Venus has no magnetosphere to protect against ion radiation from the Sun and being closer it's much more intense than Mars. Then you'd have to tether the balloon somehow, Venus has some strong vertical winds. That's going to be like thirty miles of cable to the scalding 900F surface. Venus has clouds of sulfuric acid so that's going to present a materials challenge. It's a tough sell, greatly easier to colonize Mars.

It's like when Elon started blowing smoke about colonizing the moons of Jupiter. If not already aware, Jupiter emits the most radiation of any solar body second only to the Sun. The moons around Jupiter are seriously toxic to human life. They can't even get a probe to last more than a year around Jupiter due to radiation exposure, let alone a manned spacecraft.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

1000 of the richest people? Sure, go for it

[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a good start!

[–] Mikekm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Science and innovation can only move forward with heaps of dead bodies!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Err… Venus has one of the most hostile environments in the Solar System. A titanium probe can only survive there a few hours.

Dumb.

[–] Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Venus has one of the most hostile environments in the Solar System.

It might seem unintuitive, but there's an area above the clouds that's actually really very mild as far as conditions go. It's also closer/easier to get to than Mars and various useful components can be harvested from the atmosphere which is quite dense while Mars doesn't have much.

Also, breathable air is less dense than the Venusian atmosphere so habitats filled with gas humans can breathe would actually be buoyant. You wouldn't even need a pressurized spacesuit to go outside, just an air supply.

Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_Venus

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

To add to this, one of the potential advantages is that you could use the temperature gradient as you drop further into the atmosphere as an energy source - making it one of the few areas in the solar system where you wouldn't be reliant soley on solar or nuclear.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Thank God we perfected "landing somewhere in the upper atmosphere" in the 70s.

[–] Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Thank God we perfected “landing somewhere in the upper atmosphere” in the 70s.

Am I misunderstanding or are you skeptical about it being possible to stop before reaching the surface? Because if so, that seems kind of weird. One would just need to deploy the balloons or whatever at the appropriate point. As far as technical challenges go, I'd guess this is actually going to be easier than safely getting something safely down to the surface.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 7 points 1 year ago

And flex tape and control it with Razer RGB controller.

[–] Hector_McG@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What could possibility go wrong with using a low compression strength material in a high pressure environment?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Carbon fiber is much better, that would probably be eaten through in a few seconds. Much less waste.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

VenusGate: Uh, spaceguard? We lost contact with the Venus colony several weeks ago. They've got 2 months of air so they might still be alive. Though we did learn from the last time and didn't bolt the windows shut in case they made it back to Earth on their own and needed to get out. The CEO did complain about the smell of farts increasing and the last communication said they were able to get a few open to air out the place, so we know they work.

NASA: Spaceguard isn't a thing. Also the bolts weren't the problem last time, it was the complete structural failure. Opening some windows probably allowed the pressure to equalize, which caused the vessel to drop into the "everything melts" zone. They are dead.

VenusGate: So you won't be sending anyone out to look for them?

NASA: No.

[–] Hector_McG@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Is this some kind of insanity plea to get him off the hook for any negligence claims?

[–] GnomeKat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that timeline is laughable...

26 years sounds like a long time... but time enough to set up a floating colony on venus??? yea no...

I'd like to sign up Elon for the maiden voyage

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This one requires the laughing Mexican guy with the missing teeth. Anyone got that gif in a barrel?

[–] jammnrose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] suprjami@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Only if I can drive the spaceship with a Logitech wireless controller.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lets name that deathtrap titan too...

[–] mwalkerd@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Titan Too", that's perfect

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Titan99 or in roman numerals TitanIC

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Soo I know I'm not in the slightest the target audience for his shit. But I can say there's no way in hell I would ever trust a vessel from that company going forward.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you see, it'll be rebranded as "VenusGate", a completely different company that you can trust.

[–] blastofffox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

[*] implosion
[] explosion

[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
  • [x] implosion
  • [ ] explosion
[–] Starzil@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t that the company that made that crappy sub that imploded?? This man crazy thinking we would trust him with space travel!

[–] Alvinum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He does not want us to trust him with space travel. He wants us to trust him with our money.

[–] Raisin8659@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago

For sustainable environment, the ships, habitats, and all applicable equipment will be made with safe, state-of-the-art recyclable plastics.

[–] Kyoyeou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So which social media platform will he buy

[–] SubsAndDubs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This man can't even make a safe submarine

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Spaceships are probably easier to build. No external pressure in space, no regulations for passenger space ships yet... /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] harry315@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Outsider9042@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Easier to work with 0atm vs several thousand.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›