Bridget, you deserve to be fired from your job because you are terrible at your job, not because you had sex with a woman,
I love this so hard. Epic burn.
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
706 points (97.4% liked)
politics
18894 readers
3047 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sir, a second sex video has been found.
I only opened the comments to see if anyone posted this yet lol
Appropriate use, haha.
I wish I could upvote this twice.
I gotchu
It's not gay if it's in a threeway!
Anyways, I don't care what shenanigans this lady gets up to in private, but can she now stop using hatred as a stepladder for her shitty political career?
Hatred is the only part of these people’s platform.
It's like a cheat code for winning over stupid people. Us social apes instinctually band together against things we feel threaten us. These douchebags just keep crying wolf, then bear, then cougar, then three headed rattlesnake, and the list goes on, and ride that fear to further their careers. A disappointingly large portion of the population never seems to notice how so many of these issues are entirely fictional.
Yeah I feel weird about this one. She's a self-hating hypocrite and she's toxic, but attacking her sexuality is extremely not something I'm comfortable with. There is, on the other hand, an allegation that she seuxally assaulted someone, so I guess it makes sense that they're looking for this stuff.
But maybe stop telling the press about it? Do your investigation in private and get it done.
It’s not (or shouldn’t be) about attacking her sexuality but highlighting the hypocrisy of her position. Sex sells but in principle it’s the same as if she started a group devoted to outlawing tiktok as immoral and then had her tiktok account exposed
but attacking her sexuality is extremely not something I’m comfortable with.
She sure is comfortable attacking anyone else's so why is she off-limits now?
Because that was always off-limits. For her and for you, too.
load more comments
(4 replies)
It's the hypocrisy that I dislike so much.
If she were a shit person preaching shit ideas but living by them? I'll still disagree but it won't be nearly as insulting as someone saying one thing and doing another.
Do as I say not as I do very much appears to be part of the GOP these days and it seems like every huckster and whore is getting in on the grift. It doesn't matter how you actually live your life; as long as you can tell certain people how they can live theirs that shadowy PAC money will trickle down.
load more comments
(4 replies)
She used the ‘no homo’ loophole.
i haven't even been able to find the first one yet
Commenting just in case there's an update to this breaking news story
The embedded video of Zander Moricz is so good! Click the link and go watch it. If the first line doesn't sell you, nothing will:
"Bridget, our first interaction was when you retweeted a hate article about me from The Nationalist while I was a Sarasota County School student."
Hell of a way to open a comment!
If I ever do something dumb that requires this type of public hearing please make sure this kid is the one doing the public roasting.
Why is police looking into this though?
Ah.. It's in the article. They found it in her husband's phone as he's being investigated for rape
In late November, a woman alleged that Christian Ziegler went to her apartment and raped her after his wife bowed out of a scheduled get-together.
Christ
load more comments
(1 replies)
Like she didn't see this cumming.
That’s disgusting… where did they even post these videos, which websites, I want to make sure I dont see it by mistake!!
Fat Mac was the best
More like ‘Moms for Sexual Liberty’
"The only moral sexual liberty is my sexual liberty"
Opens article, 190 comments.
Hoo boy.
The only thing that would get faster comments is a Danny davito v Shrek sex tape.
load more comments
(1 replies)
More like moms for libido amirite
Did she commit a crime that's her private life is being exposed? I know her husband is a rapist, but why are these videos being released?
Yes, she's a hypocrite, but what about her privacy? Her rights? That's YOUR privacy and YOUR rights too.
The videos aren't being released publicly. It's in the article.
Only Christian Ziegler, the police, and presumably the prosecutor(s) have access.
I think she's being accused of sexual assault by one of these women, so it's on the playing field now.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Here another great read and some back grounds of the situation, just in case anyone isn't clued up https://www.vanityfair.com/news/christian-ziegler-bridget-ziegler-rape-accusation-scandal
It has always been "Moms for Libertines". They just get confused by words.
Are they going to be released?
Its on blacked.com
I think this former Sarasota county student said it best. https://youtu.be/yq4LMi5-C6o?si=eLUXLIJ92QrnCQQR
Really her hypocrisy is just laughable and no one should care or be involved with anyone else's bedroom activities.
She is pushing her hateful and hurtful agenda in Sarasota county public schools. Meanwhile, she sends her kids to private school.
!I'm a bit split on this the more I think about it. Her private life doesn't need to be put on blast, she's a horrible enough person without putting her hypocrisy in the spotlight. However, it is her piousness that she flaunts as her guiding principle to negatively affect and control the lives of others. So can they actually be separated.!<
I'm wrong about this. Just because she's a horrible person doesn't mean her private life should become public. Other than her husband's assault, nothing that was done should be a judgement against her and she doesn't deserve to have everything aired in the public.
And as an aside Zander Moricz, the kid from the video gives me hope and his graduation speech is well worth a watch. https://youtu.be/qpTVyozS7M0?si=ZSGIpcO8m8VPe6Ud
Maybe they were moms for lesbianism but somehow lose the meaning and started the hate.
view more: next ›