this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
437 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 114 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if you disregard the Hitler aspect of the quote (which is a big if), there's no way to view that with any magnanimity.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best," Trump said. “They're not sending you…They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists."

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 40 points 10 months ago

Not just racists. Nazis.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Any number in this context is too high, but you're talking about a percentage of a percentage of a percentage... And all of that in Iowa where, like in all of America, empty land doesn't vote.

  • people that are actually registered to vote in the sparsely populated state of Iowa > that declare for the gop officially > that weren't disqualified for insurrection felonies > that responded to this poll on landlines in the middle of the workday most likely > even then, less than half of those remaining people

"The poll, conducted between Dec. 2 and 7, features responses from 502 likely Republican Iowa caucusgoers and has a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points."

These "polls" are not representative of large sentiment nationally, but don't rely on that! Register to vote, get others to register and everybody vote please!

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Only about 30% of Germans in the 1930s agreed with Naziism. Only about 30% of Italians agreed with Mussolini. That’s all it ever takes for fascism to win, because there’s also always about 30% who will passively let it happen because ‘you’re being alarmist’ and ‘it’s not that bad’ and ‘the economy is doing well’ and whatever other excuse.

That last 30% is why German civilians were made to walk through the liberated camps and witness the indescribable atrocities committed against their neighbours. They were just as culpable as those who actively participated, and that point needed to be driven home for all the world to see. eta: And many nations swiftly moved to show that lesson to children in classrooms for decades, to ensure it wouldn’t be forgotten.

If you’re seeing double-digits of fascists, you must at least double that number to approximate the real threat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 94 points 10 months ago (1 children)

42% of Iowa Republicans are Nazis. Good to know.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I hate ~~Illinois~~ Iowa Nazis.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 74 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are nazis. Republicans are nazis who run on nazi platforms using nazi language.

There is no hiding behind policy for Republican voters in 2024. If you vote Republican you are knowingly and willingly voting nazi. If you vote Republican "against Biden," you are knowingly and willingly voting nazi. If you vote for their "fiscal policy," you're voting nazi.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And that makes you… a Nazi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is for "likely Iowa caucusgoers". In other words, these are the most partisan Republican voters in Iowa.

In the not too distant past, something like this might have turned off moderates in the GOP. But now, it feels like there aren't any moderate Republicans anymore.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are either "Strong MAGA" or "Nervous MAGA". The party does not tolerate other perspectives.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

That’s the fear that’s baked into fascism, and it’s why a large portion of fascists can’t admit they’re fascists. It makes them dangerous, too.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

I'll thank Donald for one thing: uniting severe cases of mental illness that impacts perception of reality and morality leading to greed and bigotry under one banner.

Edit: My apologies for speaking for your own personal struggles of mental illness. Perhaps I'm better off just saying assholes. But then I'll get people saying, "I'm an asshole but not associated with them."

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have a mental illness, don’t lump me in with these jerkoffs

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The severity of illness that comes to mind surpasses that which you possess to such an extent it impacts your perception of reality and morality, but my apologies for casting you a part of this group.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I love your wording

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What does mental illness have to do with supporting donald trump? Very little if you ask me. The two things are not mutually exclusive, not even a little bit.

[–] AkaBobHoward@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think Lennybird may have worded that in an unfortunate way, but there is a point, the MAGAt crap is designed to exploit mental illness and nurodivergence. The thought process it takes to believe the junk that comes from them is truly magical, and that level of mental gymnastics requires an amount of breakdown of skill or deep religious belief, and while that is not All mental illness I can see where someone on the outside could look into that camp and see only mentally ill people and just put together a very very bad and frankly hurtful phrase.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's worded worse than "in an unfortunate way". The phrase used was "all the mental illness". If Lennybird wants to be less prejudice, they can rephrase it themself.

[–] AkaBobHoward@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (10 children)

I agree, but have hope that with the olive branch education can begin, at that may bring understanding.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure most people, as the user who responded to you could see, could understand the intent behind the words. Admittedly it was hyperbole and mental illness in itself shouldn't be mocked; however it's not necessarily a good sign that an ideology has a woeful concentration thereof. After all, it is an illness that can impact normalized behavior, which if that is the foundation that fuels a particular ideology.. We should be concerned.

Key to note I didn't say neurodivergent. And if you have a mental illness and aren't under the trump banner then that perhaps speaks more to the severity of those who are.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I'm happy you edited you comment. I think you can just leave mental illness out. Why bring it up without anyway to address it? When we talk about guns, mental health (with no policy action mentioned) gets brought up, and it's worthless. It's worse than worthless. It's a distraction.

I'm particularly glad you lost the phrase "all mental illness and bigots". It had a clear "homosexuals and pedophiles" ring to it when it falls on my ears. Thank you.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The real tragedy is knowing some of the kindest and most educated people I've met are still willing to vote for this monster. I can't tell if they have some ulterior motives or they're just willing to play dumb over loving a dictator because they believe in some fantasy that Trump's not a bad person deep down.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Very true. We've all witnessed this. I've thought about this a good bit, especially coming from a former Republican household decades ago.

1/3 are people who who may be educated or hard workers but are duped easily by propaganda because they're short on free time or not educated specifically in how to critically-think and analyze sources. They get home from a hard day's work and flip on fox news because they were roped in by sports and now stay for the pretty news anchors or the angry men telling them their paychecks are being stolen etc etc. Some of these people may be reachable if you could sit down with them for hours and hours at a time and lay it all out.

1/3 are the greedy socio/psychopaths who are aware enough to know the game being played and move the pieces accordingly to grift the gullible. (Bannon comes to mind)

1/3 are the world-burner outcasts who don't care or are simply too stupid to understand the long-term consequences of their actions. (Typical 4channers or Trump rally groupies).

The documentary, The Brainwashing of my Dad delves into this: How can kind, smart people be duped into this?

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

1/3 are the world-burner outcasts who don't care or are simply too stupid to understand the longterm consequences of their actions.

This group concerns me. I saw them in 2016 saying that they were voting for Trump in the hopes that the chaos he brought would change the system. Maybe you could have been fooled once into thinking this, but one would think seeing the result would make people realize that Trump's chaos wouldn't bring positive change.

Unfortunately, I'm now seeing people saying they'll vote for Trump in 2024 in order to somehow change the Democratic party. A vote for Trump won't change the Democratic party to make them better, though.

If Trump gets elected, he'll target the heads of the Democratic party and imprison them. He might allow the Democrats to continue to exist as an "other" to blame all bad things on. (Why did the economy just crash? It's those Democrats again!) But Trump won't allow the Democratic party to be an actual threat to his power, though.

It will be like opposition parties in Russia. They exist, but if they gain any traction, their leaders are suddenly arrested or have "accidents."

Voting for Trump in 2024 won't mean you get better options from the Democrats in 2028. It would mean you don't get any options but Vote Trump Again or Prison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s far too broad of a brush to paint with. Don’t do that.

Also, that sword has two edges: the Nazis aren’t afraid of the rest of us anymore because they’ve realized there’s actually a decent number of latent Nazis around the country, and now they’re coordinating with each other, and that’s a problem.

[–] AkaBobHoward@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The mistake is an understandable one, this man and his minions are greatly and rightfully hated. Many of us have grown up with mental illness as a boogieman myself included and still regularly hear it bandied around as an adjictive. You heard from many, correct as you saw fit and apologized. That took courage and wisdom. Thank you.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

In other news: the Republican Party is full of Republicans.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Disgusting fucking losers in the GOP.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like our blood is already poisoned and we need some new blood.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

Hey they call themselves 'patriots' too.... so technically...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's a great hate-speech phrase to antagonize, and to call for something primal in people. Where did he lift it? Comparing your enemies to a disease is as old as public speeches. And is really a good showcase how the public there degraded, as they find it relateable. It's really something tribal.

Imagine me saying all trump voters are genetic failures or just untermesch. That they are a biological waste that needs to be dealt with. That they are traitors to their kind for the fact they still breath.

You'd hurry up to downvote and call me names, rightfully, because there's some set culture of not going that far into dark ages, to have a basic level of empathy. There are institutions, the people who'd show you that you can't call for erasing ginger women for they are totally witches. It calls for something animal, an existiential threat, a fight or flight response, and it's a very worrying thing.

It taps exactly in a place in your psyche, where you throw a spear at anything coming close. And it doesn't ends there. People nodding to that now would react more extreme in other more casual situations.

It's a pandemic of violence. This dehumanization doesn't end, it grows onto other groups one dislikes, and just one argument then can end in a gunfight. And it would take so much time to heal.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To add:

We in Russia suffer the same fait. Although my group of people mostly denounce that ridiculous war and cringe at those celebrating it, I notice, how casual hate and insecurity about your surroundings slip everywhere. Anecdotal case: I remember like 3 cases of bus drivers driving away from people running to them at the bus stop in years, and now I have at least one each month when this late person literally knocks at the door when it drives out, I had one today. One another school shooting case making news. One another case of someone pulling a gun onto random persons.

The societal psyche is deeply harmed by any public hate-speech. It affects everyone, and it affects me when I start to cross the road and a SUV running on red light nearly avoids me, once again, or that I'm more insecure of persons randomly asking me for a lighter, or middle-eastern men just walking around although I'm the one to get banned for despising racism locally. Even though I don't subscribe to it, I take the fruits of that. These deep fears that we should've learned to avoid, especially of all kinds of 'other ones', they thrive in that climate. Even if not by agitation itself, but by it's subproducts, like if you hear about a MAGA masshooter, you'd then be more likely to have a gun yourself, and to react agressively to a likely intruder. It escalates, it makes everyone hostile, and brings so much deaths one may want to vomit.

There should be measures in place to de-secalate it on the state level. I doubt my own state would want that, since it's a fuel for conscription and they don't care about what can happen after them ("let there be fire after we quit" is a national meme), but would yours do that? I still have a ghostly hope to immigrate, so I'm kinda involved in not exchanging one burning bag of shit for another. And having the most mil and gun-spending country being overtaken by ghouls like trump makes it unsafe everywhere. This opportunist can start a WW3 if it'd save him a comfy place im the office. With the great force, comes the dead uncle Ben, and it shouldn't be like that.

And what my ranting ass wanted to say: americans have a vision of themselves in regular mass shootings, have an example of russia as a promise, and have a tool to make it slightly better by putting the ballot in the box. Why won't they? You can see 'murican sense of self-respect on Reddit. Why won't they selfrespect themselves enough to eradicate hate speech in the prime time to be sure their kids won't be shot by a random broken kid. Having a post-perenatal abortion by the AR at eleven years feels more untimely than one done at the seventh week, that's what I say.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine me saying all trump voters are genetic failures or just untermesch.

Let's be real though, if you've ever seen a rally up close that's an EASY sell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

In other news, 58% of GOP caucusgoers are liars.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Fucking stop with the poll articles.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Stupid racist fucks.

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

42% of GOP voters, tbh I'm surprised it's not like 70% or something like that.

[–] arensb@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

And yet, somehow this article does nothing to dispel my opinion that a lot of people like Trump because he says the fascist part out loud.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Well, yes, republicans are disgusting traitor filth.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Looks like a butthole in his neck...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›